Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.6K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.6K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.1K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.1K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.3K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.3K
Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion03:48

Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion

31.4K
Although gaseous molecules travel at tremendous speeds (hundreds of meters per second), they collide with other gaseous molecules and travel in many different directions before reaching the desired target. At room temperature, a gaseous molecule will experience billions of collisions per second. The mean free path is the average distance a molecule travels between collisions. The mean free path increases with decreasing pressure; in general, the mean free path for a gaseous molecule will be...
31.4K
Protein Diffusion in the Membrane01:24

Protein Diffusion in the Membrane

5.7K
Proteins show rotational as well as lateral diffusion across the membrane. The lateral diffusion of proteins was confirmed through the cell fusion experiment where mouse and human cells were fused, resulting in hybrid cells. When the human and mouse cells fused, the specific membrane proteins on human and mouse cells were marked with the red and green-fluorescent markers, respectively. Initially, the red and green fluorescence was located on the respective hemisphere of the cell. As time...
5.7K
Diffusion01:12

Diffusion

221.8K
Diffusion is the passive movement of substances down their concentration gradients—requiring no expenditure of cellular energy. Substances, such as molecules or ions, diffuse from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration in the cytosol or across membranes. Eventually, the concentration will even out, with the substance moving randomly but causing no net change in concentration. Such a state is called dynamic equilibrium, which is essential for maintaining overall...
221.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineered multicomponent bioink enables neuronal maturation and activity in brain-like tissue models.

Trends in biotechnology·2026
Same author

Microfluidic platforms for precision delivery of therapeutic cells in regenerative and personalized medicine.

Advanced drug delivery reviews·2026
Same author

Corrigendum: Toward a neurospheroid niche model: optimizing embedded 3D bioprinting for fabrication of neurospheroid brain-like co-culture constructs (2021<i>Biofabrication</i>13 015014).

Biofabrication·2025
Same author

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection for the identification of bacterial infections in clinical wound samples.

Talanta·2025
Same author

A pumpless microfluidic co-culture system to model the effects of shear flow on biological barriers.

Lab on a chip·2025
Same author

Recent advances in 3D bioprinted neural models: A systematic review on the applications to drug discovery.

Advanced drug delivery reviews·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Nanostructured Ag-zeolite Composites as Luminescence-based Humidity Sensors
07:13

Nanostructured Ag-zeolite Composites as Luminescence-based Humidity Sensors

Published on: November 15, 2016

10.7K

Diffusion-based humidity control membrane for microfluidic-based gas detectors.

Mohammad Paknahad1, Jannat Singh Bachhal1, Mina Hoorfar1

  • 1University of British Columbia, School of Engineering, Kelowna, Canada.

Analytica Chimica Acta
|April 24, 2018
PubMed
Summary

A new humidity removal membrane stabilizes microfluidic gas analyzers. This device significantly improves sensor selectivity for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by minimizing humidity interference.

Keywords:
Feature extractionGas sensorHumidity controlMicrofluidic-based gas analyzerVoaltile organic compound

More Related Videos

A Microfluidic-based Hydrodynamic Trap for Single Particles
10:13

A Microfluidic-based Hydrodynamic Trap for Single Particles

Published on: January 21, 2011

17.3K
A Versatile Kit Based on Digital Microfluidics Droplet Actuation for Science Education
05:46

A Versatile Kit Based on Digital Microfluidics Droplet Actuation for Science Education

Published on: April 26, 2021

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Nanostructured Ag-zeolite Composites as Luminescence-based Humidity Sensors
07:13

Nanostructured Ag-zeolite Composites as Luminescence-based Humidity Sensors

Published on: November 15, 2016

10.7K
A Microfluidic-based Hydrodynamic Trap for Single Particles
10:13

A Microfluidic-based Hydrodynamic Trap for Single Particles

Published on: January 21, 2011

17.3K
A Versatile Kit Based on Digital Microfluidics Droplet Actuation for Science Education
05:46

A Versatile Kit Based on Digital Microfluidics Droplet Actuation for Science Education

Published on: April 26, 2021

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Microfluidic gas analyzers are susceptible to humidity fluctuations.
  • Humidity significantly impacts sensor performance and accuracy.
  • Existing methods for humidity control are often complex or costly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a cost-effective diffusion-based humidity removal membrane for microfluidic gas analyzers.
  • To assess the impact of humidity on volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor performance.
  • To enhance the selectivity and reliability of gas sensors under varying humidity levels.

Main Methods:

  • A 3D-printed microfluidic gas sensor was employed.
  • Four VOCs (three alcohols, one ketone) were tested across 15%-80% relative humidity.
  • Two feature extraction methods (normalization and integration) were used to analyze sensor response.
  • A novel diffusion-based humidity removal membrane utilizing inorganic salts was developed and tested.

Main Results:

  • Sensor performance degraded significantly with humidity changes as low as 5%.
  • Feature extraction methods alone could not fully compensate for humidity-induced errors.
  • The developed humidity removal membrane increased sensor selectivity by 36%.
  • The membrane effectively minimized humidity's effect on the sensor's response pattern.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed humidity removal membrane is a reliable and cost-effective solution for microfluidic gas analyzers.
  • This technology significantly improves sensor accuracy and selectivity in humid environments.
  • The device is suitable for applications like breath analyzers where precise VOC detection is critical.