Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
Published on: March 4, 2018
Clinical evaluation of monotherapy with cefpirome for infections complicating hematological disorders
1Department of Hematology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Abstract:
The clinical effects of cefpirome (CPR) monotherapy were evaluated in 38 infected patients with hematological diseases. The underlying diseases of the patients were chiefly acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, malignant lymphoma, and aplastic anemia, and 18 patients were clinically neutropenic (<500 neutrophils/μL). Septicemia, pneumonia, or an unexplained fever, were the predominant complicating infections. The clinical efficacy of CPR was satisfactory or improved in 89.5% of patients. When compared to empirical combination therapy with 2 antibiotics, monotherapy with CPR reduced the drip infusion volume and the frequency of antibiotic administration, resulting in a better quality of life due to less frequent night urination, a low cost/benefit ratio, and reduction in nursing responsibilities. Due to this high efficacy rate, monotherapy with CPR should be considered as a front-line therapeutic approach in patients with infections accompanying hematological diseases, particularly those with neutropenia. J Infect Chemother 1996;2:75-78.
Insights
Cefpirome (CPR) monotherapy demonstrated high efficacy in treating infections in patients with hematological diseases, including neutropenic cases. This approach offers a better quality of life and reduced nursing burden compared to combination therapy.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with hematological diseases are susceptible to severe infections.
- Neutropenia significantly increases infection risk and complications.
- Empirical antibiotic therapy is crucial in managing these infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy and benefits of cefpirome (CPR) monotherapy.
- To compare CPR monotherapy with empirical combination antibiotic therapy.
- To assess the impact on patient quality of life and healthcare resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- Prospective evaluation of 38 infected patients with hematological diseases.
- Included patients with acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, lymphoma, and aplastic anemia.
- Monitored clinical outcomes, infection types (septicemia, pneumonia, fever), and neutropenia status.
Main Results:
- Cefpirome (CPR) monotherapy achieved satisfactory or improved clinical efficacy in 89.5% of patients.
- Compared to combination therapy, CPR monotherapy reduced infusion volume and administration frequency.
- Led to improved quality of life, lower cost-benefit ratio, and reduced nursing workload.
Conclusions:
- Cefpirome (CPR) monotherapy is highly effective for infections in hematological disease patients.
- It offers significant advantages over combination therapy, improving patient well-being.
- Recommended as a front-line treatment, especially for neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

