Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

22.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
22.2K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

425
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
425
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.3K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

23.5K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
23.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in managing the noninfected open chest after cardiac surgery: Negative-pressure wound therapy.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2019
Same author

Clinical Courses of HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2019
Same author

Intervention for arch obstruction after the Norwood procedure: Prevalence, associated factors, and practice variability.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2019
Same author

Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2019
Same author

Biatrial maze procedure versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: New analytical approaches and end points.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2018
Same author

Surgical treatment of right-sided infective endocarditis.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.

Umberto Benedetto1, Stuart J Head2, Gianni D Angelini1

  • 1Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, UK.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
|April 24, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Propensity score (PS) methods offer advantages over traditional regression for controlling confounding in observational studies. These PS methods, estimating treatment effects by modeling confounder-treatment relationships, are useful with many confounders or few outcomes.

More Related Videos

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay
06:45

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Published on: May 26, 2011

15.7K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay
06:45

Transmembrane Domain Oligomerization Propensity determined by ToxR Assay

Published on: May 26, 2011

15.7K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional regression methods adjust for confounders by modeling covariate-outcome relationships.
  • Confounding by indication is a challenge in observational studies, potentially biasing treatment effect estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review propensity score (PS) methods for controlling confounding by indication in observational research.
  • To provide guidance on implementing PS matching, stratification, weighting, and covariate adjustment.

Main Methods:

  • Propensity score methods estimate the probability of treatment assignment based on baseline covariates.
  • Commonly estimated using logistic regression, PS facilitates matching, stratification, or weighting to balance confounders between treatment groups.

Main Results:

  • PS methods are not limited by the number of outcome events, making them suitable for scenarios with small outcomes or numerous confounders.
  • PS methods provide an unbiased estimate of the treatment effect by creating comparable groups.

Conclusions:

  • Propensity score methods offer a robust alternative to traditional regression for addressing confounding by indication.
  • These methods enhance the validity of treatment effect estimates in observational studies, particularly in complex scenarios.