Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic sterilization. A comparison of current techniques.

S D Khandwala1

  • 1Khandwala Hospital, Bombay, India.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|May 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hysteroscopy using a CO2 tubal insufflator without the vacuum cannula.

Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1986
Same author

Development of a simplified laparoscopic sterilization technique.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·1984
Same author

Operative laparoscopy: a preliminary study.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India·1979
Same author

Laparoscopic sterilization with spring-loaded clip and tubal ring in postabortal cases--one-year follow-up.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·1978
Same author

2,420 O.P.D. vacuum aspirations with a new suction curette.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India·1975
Same author

Menstrual regulation.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India·1975

Comparing laparoscopic sterilization methods, electrical techniques like bipolar electrocoagulation show fewer difficulties and failures, but carry risks like burns. Clips are better for potential reversal, while electrical methods suit tubal pathology.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Laparoscopic sterilization is a common method for permanent contraception.
  • Various techniques exist, including electrocoagulation, rings, and clips.
  • Choosing the optimal method depends on patient factors and desired outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of different laparoscopic sterilization techniques.
  • To analyze technical difficulties, failure rates, and complication profiles.
  • To evaluate suitability for specific patient populations and future reversal.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of international data on bipolar electrocoagulation, endocoagulation, silicone ring, Hulka clip, and Filshie clip.
  • Comparison of technical success, method failure, surgical complications, and pregnancy rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of outcomes in women with tubal pathology and those desiring reversal.

    • Main Results:

    • Electrical methods (bipolar electrocoagulation, endocoagulation) had fewer technical difficulties and failures than rings or clips.
    • Bipolar electrocoagulation and endocoagulation had the fewest surgical complications, though electrical burns were more serious.
    • Hulka and Filshie clips had lower complication rates than silicone rings.
    • Pregnancy rates from method failure were low across all techniques.
    • Ectopic pregnancies were a concern with electrical methods.
    • Sterilization reversal success rates were highest with Hulka and Filshie clips.

    Conclusions:

    • Electrical sterilization methods are preferable for women with pelvic adhesions and tubal pathology.
    • Clip methods are preferable for women who may seek future sterilization reversal.
    • Method selection should consider individual patient characteristics and potential complications.