Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

697
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
697
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

3.3K
A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.0K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.0K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

6.3K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
6.3K
Personality Disorders: Narcissistic and Avoidant01:26

Personality Disorders: Narcissistic and Avoidant

841
Narcissistic and avoidant personality traits represent two contrasting patterns of behavior that significantly influence social interactions and self-perception. While individuals with narcissistic disorder seek admiration and validation, individuals with avoidant personality disorder withdraw due to fear of judgment.
Characteristics of Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Narcissistic individuals exhibit an inflated sense of self-importance and an excessive need for admiration. They are often...
841

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Defense of Institutional Conscience Rights for Secular Hospitals: Philosophical Justifications and Practical Applications.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Bioethics as an emerging moral tradition and some implications for adversarial cooperation.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

The Proper Uses and Constraints on Exercises of Conscience in Cases of Profound Neurological Injury: A Dialogue with Our Colleagues.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2024
Same author

On What Grounds? A Pilot Study of References Used in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Education.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2024
Same author

The Reasonable Content of Conscience in Public Bioethics.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster
08:08

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 13, 2014

11.8K

Conscience claims, metaphysics, and avoiding an LGBT eugenic.

Abram Brummett

    Bioethics
    |April 25, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    New reproductive technologies raise ethical dilemmas for LGBT couples. This study argues that conscience claims against these technologies are often based on implausible metaphysical beliefs and should be limited.

    Keywords:
    LGBTassisted reproductive technologiesbioethicsconscientious objectiondiscriminationmetaphysics

    More Related Videos

    Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
    09:00

    Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

    Published on: October 3, 2020

    4.5K
    Author Spotlight: A Smartphone-Based Imaging Method for C. elegans Lawn Avoidance Assay
    07:39

    Author Spotlight: A Smartphone-Based Imaging Method for C. elegans Lawn Avoidance Assay

    Published on: February 24, 2023

    10.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

    Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster
    08:08

    Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

    Published on: December 13, 2014

    11.8K
    Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
    09:00

    Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

    Published on: October 3, 2020

    4.5K
    Author Spotlight: A Smartphone-Based Imaging Method for C. elegans Lawn Avoidance Assay
    07:39

    Author Spotlight: A Smartphone-Based Imaging Method for C. elegans Lawn Avoidance Assay

    Published on: February 24, 2023

    10.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Reproductive Technology
    • LGBTQ+ Rights

    Background:

    • Novel assisted reproductive technologies (ART) introduce complex ethical considerations regarding LGBTQ+ individuals.
    • Clinicians may use conscience clauses to deny ART services to LGBTQ+ couples based on moral objections.
    • Existing legal frameworks and ethical guidelines for conscience clauses in healthcare are being challenged by emerging reproductive technologies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the ethical implications of novel ART for LGBTQ+ individuals.
    • To analyze the applicability and limitations of conscience clauses in the context of LGBTQ+-inclusive reproductive healthcare.
    • To propose a framework for evaluating conscience claims in bioethics, particularly those concerning LGBTQ+ individuals.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current literature on ART, bioethics, and LGBTQ+ rights.
    • Analysis of legal precedents and ethical arguments surrounding conscience clauses.
    • Philosophical critique of metaphysical claims underlying objections to LGBTQ+-inclusive reproductive technologies.
    • Examination of proposed constraints on conscience claims by Wicclair, NeJaime, and Siegel.

    Main Results:

    • Current conscience clauses may not adequately address novel ART scenarios involving LGBTQ+ individuals.
    • Existing critiques of conscience clause limitations may not fully engage with underlying metaphysical assumptions.
    • Metaphysical claims asserting the sinfulness of the LGBTQ+ lifestyle are highly implausible from a naturalized perspective.
    • There is a need to constrain conscience claims that are based on such implausible metaphysical foundations.

    Conclusions:

    • Conscience claims opposing LGBTQ+-inclusive ART should be constrained due to their reliance on questionable metaphysical beliefs.
    • A naturalized metaphysical perspective offers a robust framework for evaluating and limiting conscience claims in bioethics.
    • Ethical guidelines for ART must evolve to ensure equitable access for LGBTQ+ individuals while respecting conscience within defined limits.