Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Implantation and Monitoring by PET/CT of an Orthotopic Model of Human Pleural Mesothelioma in Athymic Mice
Published on: December 21, 2019
Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Imaging versus CT for Acute Appendicitis
Michael D Repplinger1, Perry J Pickhardt1, Jessica B Robbins1
1From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (M.D.R., S.K.G., J.B.H., S.B.R.), Radiology (M.D.R., P.J.P., J.B.R., D.R.K., T.J.Z., S.B.R.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (S.J.H.), Medicine (S.B.R.), Medical Physics (S.B.R.), and Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Dr, Suite 310, Mail Code 9123, Madison, WI 53705.
Abstract:
Purpose To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency department (ED) patients. Materials and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational study of ED patients at an academic medical center (February 2012 to August 2014). Eligible patients were nonpregnant and 12- year-old or older patients in whom a CT study had been ordered for evaluation for appendicitis. After informed consent was obtained, CT and MR imaging (with non-contrast material-enhanced, diffusion-weighted, and intravenous contrast-enhanced sequences) were performed in tandem, and the images were subsequently retrospectively interpreted in random order by three abdominal radiologists who were blinded to the patients' clinical outcomes. Likelihood of appendicitis was rated on a five-point scale for both CT and MR imaging. A composite reference standard of surgical and histopathologic results and clinical follow-up was used, arbitrated by an expert panel of three investigators. Test characteristics were calculated and reported as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Analysis included images of 198 patients (114 women [58%]; mean age, 31.6 years ± 14.2 [range, 12-81 years]; prevalence of appendicitis, 32.3%). The sensitivity and specificity were 96.9% (95% CI: 88.2%, 99.5%) and 81.3% (95% CI: 73.5%, 87.3%) for MR imaging and 98.4% (95% CI: 90.5%, 99.9%) and 89.6% (95% CI: 82.8%, 94.0%) for CT, respectively, when a cutoff point of 3 or higher was used. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.2 (95% CI: 3.7, 7.7) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0, 0.11) for MR imaging and 9.4 (95% CI: 5.9, 16.4) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.06) for CT, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cutoff point to maximize accuracy was 4 or higher, at which point there was no difference between MR imaging and CT. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging was similar to that of CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Insights
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) show similar diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in emergency department patients. Both imaging techniques are effective for diagnosing appendicitis, with comparable results at optimal thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency.
- Accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent complications.
- Computed tomography (CT) is widely used, but magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers an alternative without ionizing radiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus CT for acute appendicitis.
- To evaluate imaging performance in emergency department (ED) patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study of 198 ED patients (≥12 years old) undergoing both CT and MR imaging.
- Abdominal radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes, rated appendicitis likelihood on a 5-point scale.
- Reference standard: surgical/histopathologic results and clinical follow-up.
Main Results:
- At a cutoff of 3+, MR imaging sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity 81.3%.
- At a cutoff of 3+, CT sensitivity was 98.4% and specificity 89.6%.
- At an optimal cutoff of 4+, diagnostic accuracy was similar between MR imaging and CT.
Conclusions:
- MR imaging demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to CT for acute appendicitis.
- Both modalities are valuable tools in the ED setting for diagnosing appendicitis.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

