Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

07:32
Murine Flexor Tendon Injury and Repair Surgery
Published on: September 19, 2016
13.7K
Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation
1Department of Hand Surgery, The Hand Surgery Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume
|April 26, 2018
Summary
Recent flexor tendon repair techniques simplify surgery by using minimal sutures and aggressive pulley release. This allows for earlier motion and improved outcomes without compromising hand function.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Hand Surgery
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Traditional flexor tendon repair guidelines emphasize non-bulky repairs and standard peripheral sutures.
- Established protocols often involve prolonged immobilization and restricted joint positioning post-surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent advancements in flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation strategies.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified surgical and post-operative protocols.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation.
- Analysis of techniques including sparse peripheral sutures, aggressive pulley release, and early active motion.
Main Results:
- Favorable outcomes reported with modified techniques, including minimal repair ruptures and no functional bowstringing.
- New approaches allow for slightly bulky repair sites and aggressive pulley release (e.g., A2, A3, A4 pulleys).
- Shorter splinting with less wrist restriction and early out-of-splint active motion are safe with strong repairs.
Conclusions:
- Recent advancements challenge traditional guidelines regarding repair bulkiness and peripheral suture necessity.
- Aggressive pulley release and early motion protocols are safe and effective for flexor tendon repair.
- These modifications simplify surgical procedures and improve patient rehabilitation outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
48.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.4K
Convergent Evolution
33.1K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
33.1K
Mismatch Repair
43.8K
Overview
43.8K
Overview of DNA Repair
33.9K
In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Chemically...
33.9K
Base Excision Repair
26.4K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
The first step of...
26.4K
Eukaryotic Evolution
42.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
42.4K

