Systematic Modeling and Design Evaluation of Unperturbed Tumor Dynamics in Xenografts

Zinnia P Parra-Guillen1, Victor Mangas-Sanjuan1, Maria Garcia-Cremades1

  • 1Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (Z.P.P.-G.,V.M.-S.,M.G.-C., I.F.T.); Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain (Z.P.P.-G.,V.M.-S.,M.G.-C., I.F.T.); Global PK/PD & Pharmacometrics (G.M., C.P., J.E.W.) and Lilly Research Laboratories (P.W.I.), Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA Solna, Sweden.

Insights

This study analyzed tumor growth in 28 cell lines using nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models. Exponential growth was common, and NLME models can optimize preclinical drug discovery experiments.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Mathematical Biology

Background:

  • Xenograft mice are crucial for preclinical drug testing in oncology.
  • Mathematical modeling aids in understanding tumor growth dynamics and experiment optimization.
  • Systematic analysis of unperturbed tumor growth across multiple cell lines is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze the unperturbed growth of 28 tumor cell lines using a nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model.
  • To characterize tumor growth dynamics and optimize experimental designs for preclinical drug discovery.
  • To assess the impact of sampling frequency and sample size on parameter estimation precision.

Main Methods:

  • Application of a nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model to analyze tumor growth data from 28 xenograft mouse models.
  • Evaluation of exponential growth as the primary mechanism for tumor progression.
  • Simulation studies to determine optimal sampling schedules and required sample sizes for accurate parameter estimation.

Main Results:

  • Exponential growth was the predominant growth mechanism across most cell lines, with rates varying from 0.0204 to 0.203 day⁻¹.
  • No consistent growth patterns were observed across different tumor types, emphasizing the need for diverse cell line data.
  • Precise parameter estimation was achieved with measurements every 2 days; reducing frequency had minimal impact on precision, but ~50 mice are needed for variability characterization.

Conclusions:

  • Nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models are feasible for systematic tumor growth characterization in drug discovery.
  • The findings provide a data-driven approach to optimize experimental designs, including sampling windows and minimizing sample sizes.
  • This study offers valuable insights for improving the efficiency and accuracy of preclinical oncological drug development.

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.7K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
14.1K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
330
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K