Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

53.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
53.9K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

230
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
230
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

248
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
248

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rotation-tolerant representations elucidate the time-course of high-level object processing.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies.

Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers·2026
Same author

A Double-Edged Sword Perspective on Young Australians' Use of Social Media: A Structured Narrative Review.

Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals·2025
Same author

How Transparent and Reproducible Are Studies That Use Animal Models of Opioid Addiction?

Addiction biology·2025
Same author

Towards Clinical Diagnoses: Classifying Alzheimer's Disease Using Single fMRI, Small Datasets, and Transfer Learning.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.4K

Reading direction influences lateral biases in letter processing.

Kim Ransley1, Patrick T Goodbourn2, Elizabeth H L Nguyen1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Sydney.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|April 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reading direction influences visual attention. Bilingual individuals reading English (left-to-right) showed a deficit in identifying targets in the right visual field, but this vanished when reading Arabic (right-to-left).

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Humans exhibit limited capacity for identifying simultaneous, briefly presented visual targets.
  • Previous research noted a deficit in the right visual field for concurrent rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) tasks.
  • This deficit was hypothesized to stem from left-to-right reading habits or right-hemisphere advantages in dual-stimulus processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of reading direction experience in the observed right visual field deficit.
  • To differentiate between a reading-experience hypothesis and a general right-hemisphere dual-stimulation advantage.

Main Methods:

  • Recruited bilingual participants proficient in both English (left-to-right) and Arabic (right-to-left) reading.
  • Administered concurrent RSVP tasks using English and Arabic letter stimuli.
  • Analyzed target identification accuracy and error patterns across visual fields and languages.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated a significant right visual field deficit when processing English letters, consistent with prior findings.
  • This deficit was absent when processing Arabic letters, indicating language-specific effects.
  • Error patterns suggested the deficit arises from a postsampling process, likely consolidation into short-term memory.

Conclusions:

  • Reading direction significantly modulates the second-target deficit in concurrent RSVP tasks.
  • The findings support the hypothesis that reading experience, not a general right-hemisphere advantage, underlies this attentional limitation.
  • The critical processing bottleneck appears to occur after initial stimulus sampling, during memory consolidation.