Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding the Self01:28

Understanding the Self

324
The self is a central aspect of human identity, encompassing an individual’s beliefs, emotions, perceptions, and experiences. It is a cognitive and psychological construct that enables individuals to interpret their traits and behaviors, influencing how they perceive themselves and interact with the world. While personality consists of stable and enduring characteristics, the self is shaped by self-perception and social experiences. This distinction highlights the dynamic nature of the...
324
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Understanding Self-Concept01:20

Understanding Self-Concept

312
The self-concept encompasses individuals' beliefs about themselves, structured through cognitive frameworks known as self-schemas. These schemas function as mental representations of specific traits or behaviors, influencing how self-relevant information is perceived, processed, and remembered. For example, individuals who are schematic for body weight are more likely to interpret routine experiences—such as dining out or shopping—through the lens of that trait. Conversely, those...
312

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Asking the Right Questions-Human Factors Considerations for Telemedicine Design.

Current allergy and asthma reports·2020
Same author

Verbal redundancy aids memory for filmed entertainment dialogue.

The Journal of psychology·2014
Same author

Intrinsic motivation and attentional capture from gamelike features in a visual search task.

Behavior research methods·2013
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.3K

Understanding Human Error in Naval Aviation Mishaps.

Andrew T Miranda1

  • 1Naval Safety Center, Norfolk, Virginia.

Human Factors
|April 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing Naval aviation mishaps revealed that teamwork failures significantly impact aviator performance and judgment. Understanding these external factors is crucial for improving aviation safety and decision-making.

Keywords:
HFACSaviationhuman errorsafety

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Understanding Cerebellar Pattern Formation
13:18

Understanding Cerebellar Pattern Formation

Published on: November 1, 2007

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.3K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Understanding Cerebellar Pattern Formation
13:18

Understanding Cerebellar Pattern Formation

Published on: November 1, 2007

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Aviation safety research
  • Human factors in complex systems
  • Organizational psychology

Background:

  • Organizational mishaps often stem from complex interactions within systems.
  • Naval aviation mishap data offers insights into organizational influences on aviator performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify external factors affecting aviator performance and decisions in Naval aviation mishaps.
  • To analyze organizational influences on aviator judgment and skill.

Main Methods:

  • Bayes' theorem probability formula applied to 95 severe Naval aviation mishaps (2011-2016).
  • Content analysis of selected mishap reports to examine contextual factors.

Main Results:

  • Bayes' theorem identified 6 latent factors impacting aviator behavior; 3 informed content analysis.
  • Technological environment, misperceptions, and mental awareness affected basic aviation skills.
  • Teamwork failures, plan continuation, diffused responsibility, resource limits, and risk management deficiencies impacted judgment.

Conclusions:

  • Bayes' theorem application highlighted latent factors in Naval aviation mishaps.
  • Teamwork failures were significantly detrimental to aviator skill and judgment.