Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
Rodolfo Montironi1, Alessia Cimadamore1, Silvia Gasparrini1
1a Section of Pathological Anatomy , Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals , Ancona , Italy.
Introduction:
The Gleason grading system is one of the most important prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa). From the 2005 to the 2014 conference organized by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), the histological criteria for the Gleason patterns were improved, resulting in the shrinkage of the Gleason pattern (GP) 3 and expansion of the GP 4. Areas Covered: Cribriform, fused, ill-defined and glomeruloid glands are part of the morphologic spectrum of the current GP 4. Cribriform, derived from the Latin word cribrum (i.e. sieve), was introduced by Gleason to describe glands composed of a solid sheet with perforations or lumina. Cribriform morphology has a worse prognosis compared with the other, non-cribriform, GP4 morphologies. A practical implication is that a cribriform growth precludes a patient from selecting an active surveillance (AS) protocol. Expert commentary: The presence of these four growth patterns should be incorporated into the current Grade Group (GG) system. Enhancing our understanding of cribriform tumor behavior will lead to correctly identifying and treating those patients that will die because of PCa, while sparing treatment in those who do not require it.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
Relationship Formation
Ending Relationships
Relationship Growth
Social Relationships and Well-Being
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

