Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Picture memory: recognizing added and deleted details.

K Pezdek1, R Maki, D Valencia-Laver

  • 1Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate School, California 91711-6175.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current unmet needs in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the relevance of progression-free survival as clinical endpoint, and expectations for future clinical trial design: an international Delphi consensus report.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

Patient-derived xenografts effectively capture responses to oncology therapy in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with solid tumors.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Assessment of recurrent laryngeal nerve function during thyroid surgery.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2014
Same author

Trabectedin is a feasible treatment for soft tissue sarcoma patients regardless of patient age: a retrospective pooled analysis of five phase II trials.

British journal of cancer·2013
Same author

How a multidisciplinary team improved a process to attain positive patient outcome.

Insight (American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses)·2002
Same author

Genetic determinants of bone mineral content in premature infants.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2001
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

People better recognize simple pictures than complex ones, a finding called the asymmetric confusability effect. This occurs because visual memory focuses on core elements, making complex details harder to recall.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • The asymmetric confusability effect demonstrates that simple pictures are recognized more accurately than complex ones.
  • This effect suggests a difference in how simple and complex visual information is encoded and retrieved from memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To confirm the robustness of the asymmetric confusability effect.
  • To test a model explaining the schematic encoding of visual information.
  • To investigate the role of schematic processing and elaborative details in visual recognition memory.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using same-changed recognition tests with simple and complex picture forms.
  • Experiment 1 manipulated schematic processing by providing pre-picture descriptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments 2 and 3 examined memory retrieval and the impact of elaborative details.

    • Main Results:

    • The asymmetric confusability effect was confirmed and exaggerated by schematic processing.
    • Results refuted the idea that the effect stems from anticipation of a recall test.
    • Retrieving nonschematic details from complex pictures for recognition was found to be difficult.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual information is primarily encoded schematically, leading to memory representations similar to simple forms.
    • The asymmetric confusability effect is rooted in schematic processing.
    • While overall recognition is strong, detecting missing complex visual details is challenging.