Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Natural Products
Published on: April 6, 2019
Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in Oncology: Critical Appraisal of Available Data on Switching
Paul Declerck1, Georgios Bakalos2, Elias Zintzaras3
1Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Purpose:
With the introduction of biosimilars of anticancer monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in oncology, physicians are potentially confronted with the question whether it is clinically adequate to switch patients who are clinically stable on treatment with the reference product to a newly available biosimilar (or vice versa/from 1 biosimilar to another). For a proper impact assessment of switching, robust, product-specific, and clinically relevant evidence should be required, ideally including data from appropriately designed switching studies. In this article, we assess the current body of switching data available for approved or proposed biosimilars of anticancer mAbs.
Methods:
PubMed was systematically searched and ClinicalTrials.gov and abstract databases of selected congresses were hand-searched to identify all switching studies including biosimilars of anticancer mAbs.
Findings:
We identified 8 switching studies with biosimilars of rituximab (CT-P10, GP2013, PF-05280586, and BCD-020) and trastuzumab (ABP 980). Two were performed in oncology indications and the other 6 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Key elements of a well-designed switching study, such as randomization and blinding, were contained in several of the studies, but significant limitations were also present. The most frequent limitations were low statistical power because of small patient numbers, lack of an appropriate control arm, short follow-up, chosen outcome measures, and (for studies performed in RA) the concern whether switching data can be extrapolated to oncology indications. Accordingly, the data from these studies need to be interpreted with caution. Of note, all identified studies included a single switch only, whereas multiple switches may occur in the real-world setting. The scientific need to evaluate the impact of repeated switching has been recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration, who incorporated such a requirement in its draft guidance on interchangeability.
Implications:
From the scarce data available, the consequences of switching between reference product mAbs and their biosimilar(s) in the oncology setting are as yet unknown. Additional clinical evidence from well-designed switching studies is needed to guide switching decisions.
Insights
Switching patients between anticancer monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their biosimilars in oncology lacks sufficient clinical evidence. More robust switching studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of these transitions.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Biosimilars of anticancer monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are increasingly available.
- Physicians face decisions regarding switching patients between reference mAbs and biosimilars.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the current body of evidence from switching studies for biosimilars of anticancer mAbs.
- To evaluate the clinical adequacy of switching patients on stable treatment.
Main Methods:
- Systematic PubMed search and hand-searching of ClinicalTrials.gov and congress databases.
- Identification of switching studies involving biosimilars of rituximab and trastuzumab.
Main Results:
- Eight switching studies were identified, with most in rheumatoid arthritis, not oncology.
- Studies had limitations including low statistical power, short follow-up, and lack of appropriate control arms.
- Data from existing studies require cautious interpretation, especially regarding extrapolation to oncology.
Conclusions:
- The consequences of switching between reference mAbs and biosimilars in oncology remain largely unknown.
- Additional well-designed switching studies are essential to guide clinical decisions regarding biosimilar use in cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Switching of BJT
Cut-off Mode ("Off" State): In this state, both the emitter-base and collector-base junctions are...
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Critical Values

