Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring
Published on: June 13, 2025
Is Invasive Pressure Monitoring More Reliable Than Non-Invasive in Patients with Cardiovascular Pathology? - A Case
Andreia Fernandes1, Luísa Coimbra1, Inês Delgado1
1Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal.
Insights
Invasive blood pressure monitoring can be inaccurate during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with diffuse atheromatosis. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring may serve as a reliable alternative for blood pressure management in such cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) necessitates precise arterial blood pressure (BP) management for optimal cerebral perfusion.
- Invasive blood pressure (IBP) monitoring is standard but susceptible to artifacts, potentially yielding inaccurate readings.
- Diffuse atheromatosis presents a challenge for accurate BP monitoring during CEA.
Observation:
- A case of CEA in a 64-year-old male with diffuse atheromatosis, dyslipidemia, and hypertension is presented.
- Intraoperative IBP readings showed a significant discrepancy with noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, particularly with carotid stump pressure.
- NIBP was utilized for BP management, guiding therapeutic targets throughout the procedure and postoperative period.
Findings:
- A substantial difference between IBP and NIBP (>40 mmHg) was observed, attributed to diffuse atheromatosis.
- NIBP measurements correlated with carotid stump pressure, suggesting its reliability in this specific clinical scenario.
- Despite an initial hypertensive crisis leading to a cervical hematoma requiring reoperation, NIBP monitoring proved adequate postoperatively.
Implications:
- IBP monitoring's accuracy may be compromised in patients with diffuse atheromatosis.
- NIBP can serve as a viable, albeit non-continuous, alternative for BP monitoring when IBP is unreliable during CEA.
- Accurate BP monitoring is critical for preventing cerebrovascular complications and ensuring patient safety during and after CEA.
Introduction:
Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) require strict arterial blood pressure (BP) control to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion. Invasive blood pressure (IBP) is the gold standard, however artifacts may lead to erroneous readings.
Methods:
We report a case of CEA using IBP monitoring.
Results:
A 64-year-old man, American Society Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status 3 (diffuse atheromathosis, dyslipidemia and non-medicated hypertension), was presented for an elective right CEA. ASA standard, neuromuscular block monitoring, anesthesia depth and cerebral oximetry were used as monitorization. On preanaesthetic assessment noninvasive BP (NIBP) had no significant difference between right and left arms (180/90 mmHg). IBP monitoring was placed in left radial artery after several attempts in both arms. Surgery was performed under balanced general anesthesia (GA). Intra-operatively the patient remained stable (140/86 mmHg) however the systolic carotid artery stump pressure (SP) was 210-220mmHg. This finding was confirmed by measuring NIBP in both legs. At this point NIBP was used to monitor and guide the BP target until the end of the procedure and during postoperative period (PO) in postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Surgery proceeded uneventfully. After discharge to the ward (48h stay at PACU), a hypertensive crisis lead to cervical neck haematoma which required emergent surgery under GA. Intraoperatively the BP was assessed with NIBP. After a new period of 48h at PACU the patient was discharged to the ward and subsequently from the hospital on the 8th postoperative day, without further complications.
Conclusion:
IBP allow beat-by-beat measures with optimization of BP in order to improve cerebral perfusion during CEA. IBP can be inaccurate in patients with diffuse atheromatosis. NIBP may be an alternative, however is not continuous and is expected to be less accurate than the IBP.1 The high IBP-NIBP difference (>40 mmHg) was clinically relevant and in this patient might be explained by diffuse atheromatosis. NIBP was compatible with carotid SP, indicating that, in this case was a reliable and accurate method of monitoring.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Reliability and Validity
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Data Reporting and Recording
Overview of the Cardiovascular System
Heart
The heart is the central pump of the cardiovascular system that circulates blood throughout the body. It comprises two atria receiving the blood and two ventricles pumping blood out of the heart. Their rhythmic contractions, called heartbeats, ensure that blood flow remains continuous.
Blood Vessels
Blood...
Distribution Reliability and Automation

