Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

49.9K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
49.9K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.8K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.8K
Comparative Excretory Systems02:24

Comparative Excretory Systems

26.7K
Animals have evolved different strategies for excretion, the removal of waste from the body. Most waste must be dissolved in water to be excreted, so an animal’s excretory strategy directly affects its water balance.
26.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

617
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
617
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

17.0K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
17.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Thermal Tolerance Shapes Species Distributions: An Integrative Perspective on the Most Diverse Lizard Family from North America.

The American naturalist·2026
Same author

Phylogenomics of the woodland salamanders (Plethodon): Reticulate evolution and indistinct species boundaries.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same author

Modeling trait heterogeneity and inferring causal links in the macroevolution of growth habit in eudicot angiosperms.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

An angiosperm-wide perspective on reproductive strategies and floral traits.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

An Evolving View of Lineage Diversification.

Systematic biology·2025
Same author

Widespread evolution of poricidal flowers: a striking example of morphological convergence across flowering plants.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.1K

Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods.

Josef C Uyeda1, Rosana Zenil-Ferguson2,3, Matthew W Pennell4

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 926 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA.

Systematic Biology
|April 28, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) are often misunderstood, leading to flawed analyses susceptible to unique evolutionary events. This study proposes "phylogenetic natural history" to improve hypothesis testing in evolutionary biology.

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.1K
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Comparative Biology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Closely related species exhibit trait similarities due to descent with modification, violating statistical independence assumptions.
  • Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) were developed to address trait non-independence in evolutionary studies.
  • Current understanding and application of PCMs may be misleading, leading to methodological vulnerabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically re-evaluate the conceptual framework and application of phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs).
  • To identify and demonstrate the susceptibility of current PCMs to unreplicated evolutionary events.
  • To propose a novel approach, "phylogenetic natural history," for more robust hypothesis testing in comparative biology.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three case studies illustrating the problem of singular evolutionary events in comparative biology.
  • Development of a framework unifying hypothesis testing with data-driven approaches.
  • Conceptual re-imagining of phylogenies as probabilistic graphical models.

Main Results:

  • PCMs, as currently applied, are susceptible to unreplicated evolutionary events, causing widespread confusion.
  • Singular evolutionary events represent a recurring problem across various controversies in comparative biology.
  • The proposed "phylogenetic natural history" approach offers a potential solution to disentangle singular events from broader factors.

Conclusions:

  • The prevailing view of PCMs as solely addressing trait non-independence is misleading.
  • A more rigorous approach is needed to weigh evidence for causal hypotheses in evolutionary biology.
  • Re-framing phylogenies as probabilistic graphical models can enhance the clarity and rigor of evolutionary inference.