Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The probability of causation approach.

¹Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Attorneys at Law, Philadelphia, PA 19109.

|August 1, 1988

Summary

Probability of causation (PC) offers little hope for radiation scientists regarding legal rulings. Its adoption in compensation schemes may displease scientists, with potential benefits possibly limited to medical practice impacts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An overview of the current state of radiation litigation.

Health physics·2001

Same author

A radiation litigation causation analysis which achieves fairness to both litigants.

Health physics·2001

Same author

Comment on a review of probability of causation and its use in a compensation scheme for nuclear industry workers in the UK.

Health physics·1998

Same author

Managed care and managed competition: preparing for an uncertain future.

Indiana medicine : the journal of the Indiana State Medical Association·1993

Same author

Re: Probability of causation.

Health physics·1993

Same author

Probability of causation for cancers potentially induced by ionizing radiation.

Medical physics·1989

Area of Science:

Environmental Health
Toxicology
Legal Medicine

Background:

Court rulings in radiation cases often face dissatisfaction.
Probability of causation (PC) has been proposed as a potential improvement for these legal contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the expected role and impact of probability of causation (PC) in legal and scientific contexts related to radiation exposure.
To assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of PC for scientists and legislative compensation schemes.

Main Methods:

The study involves a critical analysis of the concept of probability of causation.
It reviews existing legal precedents and scientific perspectives on radiation litigation.

Main Results:

The author expresses skepticism about PC playing a significant role in radiation litigation within the next decade.
It is anticipated that if adopted in legislative compensation, PC's application may not align with scientific expectations.
Potential positive impacts might emerge in related fields, such as influencing medical practice.

Conclusions:

Probability of causation (PC) is viewed as a "false hope" for radiation scientists in the context of legal cases.
The practical application of PC in compensation schemes is unlikely to satisfy the scientific community.
The most significant contributions of PC may be indirect, influencing medical practices rather than legal outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos