Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Three-Year Impact of Immediate Invasive Strategy in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Dejan Milasinovic1, Aleksandra Milosevic2, Zorana Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic3
1Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Insights
Immediate invasive intervention for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) reduces early death or new myocardial infarction (MI) risk. Long-term outcomes beyond 30 days are similar, influenced by baseline risk, not intervention timing.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Long-term outcomes of early vs. delayed invasive strategies in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) are not well-established.
- Previous studies offer limited long-term follow-up data for NSTEMI interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term effects of immediate invasive intervention in NSTEMI patients.
- To compare clinical outcomes between immediate and delayed invasive strategies up to 3-year follow-up.
Main Methods:
- The study randomized 323 NSTEMI patients to either immediate (median 1.4 hours) or delayed (61.0 hours) invasive intervention.
- The primary endpoint was the composite of death or new myocardial infarction (MI) over 3 years.
- The Randomized Study of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (RIDDLE-NSTEMI) trial design was used.
Main Results:
- Immediate intervention significantly reduced the composite of death or new MI at 3 years (12.3% vs. 22.5%, HR 0.50, p=0.014).
- The benefit was driven by reduced early reinfarction in the immediate group; new MI rates were similar beyond 30 days.
- Three-year mortality rates were comparable (9.3% vs. 10.0%, p=0.83).
Conclusions:
- Immediate invasive intervention in NSTEMI reduces early risk of death or new MI.
- Intervention timing showed no significant impact on clinical outcomes beyond 30 days.
- Baseline risk profile, indicated by high Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score, significantly impacts long-term mortality regardless of intervention timing.
Abstract:
Previous studies compared clinical outcomes of early versus delayed invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome up to 1-year follow-up, but long-term data remain scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effects of immediate invasive intervention in patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI). The Randomized Study of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (RIDDLE-NSTEMI) was a randomized, investigator-initiated, parallel-group trial that assigned 323 patients with NSTEMI (1:1) to either immediate (median time to intervention 1.4 hours) or delayed invasive strategy (61.0 hours). The primary end point was the composite of death or new myocardial infarction (MI). At 3 years, immediate invasive intervention was associated with a lower rate of death or new MI, compared with a delayed invasive strategy (12.3% vs 22.5%, hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.87, p = 0.014). The observed benefit of immediate intervention was mainly driven by an increased early reinfarction risk in delayed strategy, with similar new MI rates beyond 30 days (4.4% in the immediate and 5.6% in the delayed group, p = 0.61). Three-year mortality was 9.3% in the immediate invasive strategy, and 10.0% in the delayed strategy (p = 0.83). High baseline Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score (>140) was associated with a significant increase in long-term mortality, regardless of the timing of invasive intervention. In conclusion, whereas immediate invasive intervention significantly reduced the early risk of new MI, the timing of invasive intervention appears to have no significant impact on clinical outcomes beyond 30 days, which seem to mostly be related to the baseline clinical risk profile.
Related Concept Videos
Freezing Point Depression and Boiling Point Elevation
The boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapor pressure is equal to ambient atmospheric pressure. Since the vapor pressure of a solution is lowered due to the presence of nonvolatile solutes, it stands to reason that the solution’s boiling point will subsequently be increased. Vapor pressure increases with temperature, and so a solution will require a higher temperature than will pure solvent to achieve any given vapor pressure, including one...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Elevation of Intermediate Points on Vertical Curves
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Impact of Groups on Individuals

