Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Osteoclast Derivation from Mouse Bone Marrow
Published on: November 6, 2014
In vivo visualisation of different modes of action of biological DMARDs inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption
Yoshinobu Matsuura1,2,3, Junichi Kikuta1,3, Yuika Kishi1
1Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Objectives:
Osteoclasts play critical roles in inflammatory bone destruction. Precursor cell migration, cell differentiation, and functional cell activation are all in play. Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been shown to significantly inhibit both bone erosion as well as synovitis, although how such agents reduce osteoclastic bone destructionin vivo has not been fully explained. Here, we used an intravital time-lapse imaging technique to directly visualise mature osteoclasts and their precursors, and explored how different biological DMARDs acted in vivo.
Methods:
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was injected into the calvarial periosteum of fluorescent reporter mice to induce inflammatory bone destruction. Time-lapse imaging was performed via intravital multiphoton microscopy 5 days after LPS injection. Biological DMARDs, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the interleukin (IL) 6 receptor (IL-6R) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4)-Ig, were intraperitoneally administered at the time of LPS injection. We determined CD80/86 expression levels in mature osteoclasts and their precursors by flow cytometry, quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry.
Results:
Of the biologicals tested, anti-IL-6R and anti-TNFα mAbs affected mature osteoclasts and switched bone-resorbing osteoclasts to non-resorbing cells. CTLA4-Ig had no action on mature osteoclasts but mobilised osteoclast precursors, eliminating their firm attachment to bone surfaces. In agreement with these results, CD80/86 (the target molecules of CTLA4-Ig) were prominently expressed only in osteoclast precursor cells, being suppressed during osteoclast maturation.
Conclusions:
Intravital imaging revealed that various biological DMARDs acted at specific therapeutic time points during osteoclastic bone destruction, with different efficacies. These results enable us to grasp the real modes of action of drugs, optimising the usage of drug regimens.
Insights
Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) target specific stages of osteoclast activity. Different DMARDs impact mature osteoclasts or their precursors, offering insights into optimizing inflammatory bone destruction treatments.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
- Rheumatology
Background:
- Osteoclasts are key players in inflammatory bone destruction, involving precursor migration, differentiation, and activation.
- Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) inhibit bone erosion and synovitis, but their precise in vivo mechanisms against osteoclasts are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly visualize the in vivo actions of different biological DMARDs on osteoclasts and their precursors during inflammatory bone destruction.
- To elucidate the specific mechanisms by which various biological DMARDs modulate osteoclast function and inflammatory bone loss.
Main Methods:
- Induced inflammatory bone destruction in mice using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection.
- Employed intravital time-lapse multiphoton microscopy to observe mature osteoclasts and precursors.
- Administered biological DMARDs (anti-IL-6R, anti-TNFα mAbs, CTLA4-Ig) and analyzed CD80/86 expression on osteoclasts and precursors.
Main Results:
- Anti-IL-6R and anti-TNFα monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) altered mature osteoclasts, reducing their bone-resorbing activity.
- CTLA4-Ig did not affect mature osteoclasts but mobilized precursors by disrupting their bone attachment.
- CD80/86, targeted by CTLA4-Ig, were highly expressed on precursors but suppressed in mature osteoclasts.
Conclusions:
- Biological DMARDs exhibit distinct in vivo mechanisms of action at specific stages of osteoclastic bone destruction.
- Understanding these specific drug actions can optimize treatment strategies for inflammatory bone diseases.
- Intravital imaging provides crucial insights into the real-time efficacy and targets of biological DMARDs.
Related Concept Videos
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Feedback Inhibition
What is a Mode?
There can be more than one mode in a data set if multiple values have the same highest frequency. For instance, suppose that the Statistics exam scores of 20 students are: 50; 53; 59; 59; 63; 63; 72; 72; 72; 72; 72; 76; 78; 81; 83; 84; 84; 84; 90; 93. Here, the mode is 72, as it occurs most frequently, five times.
A data set with two modes is called bimodal. For example,...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Fixed Action Patterns
What is Conservation Biology?

