Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Studying Triple Negative Breast Cancer Using Orthotopic Breast Cancer Model
Published on: March 20, 2020
DNA methyltransferase expression in triple-negative breast cancer predicts sensitivity to decitabine
Jia Yu1, Bo Qin1,2, Ann M Moyer3
1Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Abstract:
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis that lacks targeted therapies, especially in patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease. Since DNA methylation-induced silencing of tumor suppressors is common in cancer, reversal of promoter DNA hypermethylation by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine), an FDA-approved DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, has proven effective in treating hematological neoplasms. However, its antitumor effect varies in solid tumors, stressing the importance of identifying biomarkers predictive of therapeutic response. Here, we focused on the identification of biomarkers to select decitabine-sensitive TNBC through increasing our understanding of the mechanism of decitabine action. We showed that protein levels of DNMTs correlated with response to decitabine in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) organoids originating from chemotherapy-sensitive and -resistant TNBCs, suggesting DNMT levels as potential biomarkers of response. Furthermore, all 3 methytransferases, DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B, were degraded following low-concentration, long-term decitabine treatment both in vitro and in vivo. The DNMT proteins could be ubiquitinated by the E3 ligase, TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), leading to lysosome-dependent protein degradation. Depletion of TRAF6 blocked decitabine-induced DNMT degradation, conferring resistance to decitabine. Our study suggests a potential mechanism of regulating DNMT protein degradation and DNMT levels as response biomarkers for DNMT inhibitors in TNBCs.
Insights
Biomarkers predicting response to decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, were identified for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). DNMT protein levels and their degradation via TRAF6 are key to decitabine sensitivity in TNBC.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive and lacks targeted treatments, especially in chemotherapy-resistant cases.
- DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors like decitabine show promise but require biomarkers for patient selection in solid tumors.
- Understanding decitabine's mechanism is crucial for identifying predictive biomarkers in TNBC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify biomarkers for predicting decitabine response in TNBC.
- To elucidate the mechanism of decitabine action and resistance in TNBC.
Main Methods:
- Utilized patient-derived xenograft (PDX) organoids from sensitive and resistant TNBC.
- Assessed DNMT protein levels and their correlation with decitabine response.
- Investigated the role of TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) in decitabine-induced DNMT degradation.
Main Results:
- DNMT protein levels correlated with decitabine response in TNBC organoids.
- Decitabine treatment induced degradation of DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B via TRAF6-mediated ubiquitination and lysosomal pathways.
- TRAF6 depletion conferred resistance to decitabine by preventing DNMT degradation.
Conclusions:
- DNMT protein levels serve as potential biomarkers for predicting decitabine response in TNBC.
- TRAF6-mediated degradation of DNMTs is a critical mechanism for decitabine efficacy.
- Targeting DNMT degradation pathways could overcome decitabine resistance in TNBC.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Negative Regulator Molecules
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Scalar and Vector Triple Products
The scalar triple product is the dot product of a vector with the cross product of two vectors....
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Positive, Negative, and Zero Work

