Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: June 17, 2013
Effects of pulse width, waveform and current direction in the cortex: A combined cTMS-EEG study
E P Casula1, L Rocchi2, R Hannah2
1Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Pulse parameters significantly influence Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) outcomes, affecting both global and local brain activity measured by EEG. Optimizing TMS requires considering these factors beyond motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for precise cortical activation.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) parameters like pulse width, waveform, and current direction are crucial for outcomes.
- Previous studies indirectly assessed these factors using motor-evoked potentials (MEP).
- Combining TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) allows direct examination of cortical responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the effects of varying TMS pulse width, waveform, and current direction on TMS-evoked EEG responses.
- To compare these effects on global and local cortical activity with MEP.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a controllable TMS (cTMS) device to manipulate pulse parameters.
- Measured resting motor threshold (RMT), global mean field power (GMFP), and local mean field power (LMFP) in 19 healthy volunteers.
- Analyzed TMS-evoked EEG responses to assess global and local cortical excitability.
Main Results:
- Lower RMT was observed with longer pulse width monophasic posterior-to-anterior (PA) pulses.
- Monophasic pulses resulted in higher GMFP, and longer pulse widths in higher LMFP, even after RMT normalization.
- Early TMS-evoked potential (TEP) polarity was dependent on current direction.
Conclusions:
- TMS-evoked EEG responses (both local and global) vary significantly with pulse parameters, independent of RMT.
- Adjusting TMS parameters based solely on MEP threshold may not guarantee consistent neuronal activation within a cortical area.
- This highlights the importance of optimizing TMS pulse parameters for targeted cortical stimulation.
More Related Videos
11:11Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: September 23, 2017
08:16Combining Behavior and EEG to Study the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Episodic Memory
Published on: May 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Effective Value of a Periodic Waveform
The effective value of a periodic current represents the direct current (DC) that conveys the same average power to a resistor as the periodic current itself. This concept is crucial when assessing AC circuits. To determine the...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Antagonism
The most common type is receptor antagonism, where one drug acts as an antagonist to block the effects of another drug by...
Directing and Steric Effects in Disubstituted Benzene Derivatives
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Pulse
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls...