Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

13.8K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.8K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

328
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
328
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

57.3K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
57.3K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

804
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
804
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Japanese version of the Positive Eating Scale (PES-J): Psychometric evaluation and relationship with health parameters.

Journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

When does food act as a social surrogate? The interplay of need to belong and social context.

Appetite·2026
Same author

Social context shapes facial dynamics: human and machine decoding of conversation topics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Temporal Stability of Neural Markers of Motivated and Voluntary Attention: Case-by-Case and Group Analyses.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

A Refined Mobile Health Intervention (SMARTFAMILY2.0) to Promote Physical Activity and Healthy Eating in a Family Setting: Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2025
Same author

Public perceptions of health and economic impacts during COVID-19: Findings from a repeated cross-national survey in the US, UK and Germany (2020-2022).

BMJ public health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K

Risk Perceptions After Receiving Multiple Risk Feedback.

Martina Gamp1, Harald T Schupp1, Britta Renner1

  • 11 University of Konstanz, Germany.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary

People accurately perceive health risks from multiple indicators like blood pressure and glucose. Even with mixed results, elevated readings correctly increase perceived risk, showing effective integration of health feedback.

Keywords:
communicationdefensivenessmultiple risk feedbackrisk perception

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health psychology
  • Behavioral medicine
  • Risk perception research

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals process multiple health risk indicators is crucial for effective health communication.
  • Existing theories offer competing predictions regarding responses to health feedback, including self-defense and compensatory mechanisms.
  • Real-world health screenings often provide multifaceted risk information, necessitating research into its interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals perceive health risks when presented with multiple, simultaneous risk indicator feedback.
  • To test theoretical predictions regarding relative accuracy, self-defensive responses, and compensatory health beliefs in response to health risk information.
  • To determine if individuals accurately integrate diverse health risk data in a community health screening setting.

Main Methods:

  • A community health screening involved 725 participants receiving feedback on blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipid levels.
  • Participants were exposed to consistent risk profiles (all normal or all elevated) and mixed profiles (one elevated, two normal).
  • Risk perceptions were measured to assess responses to the provided health indicator feedback.

Main Results:

  • A significant relative accuracy was observed, with elevated readings leading to higher perceived risk for that specific factor.
  • The presence of normal readings did not diminish the impact of elevated readings on risk perception.
  • Findings did not support self-defensive or compensatory response models in this context.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals demonstrate a capacity for relative accuracy in perceiving health risks from multiple indicators.
  • The integration of multiple health risk feedback appears robust, unaffected by the presence of both normal and elevated readings.
  • This suggests that people can effectively process complex health information as presented in real-life scenarios.