Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

342
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
342
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of stress on political leadership evaluations.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2025
Same author

Predicting the issuance of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders in Africa: Using machine learning to develop insight for health policy research.

International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR·2023
Same author

Direct assessment of individual connotation and experience <i>An introduction to cognitive-affective mapping</i>.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2023
Same author

Psychophysiology, cognition, and political differences: <i>Guest editors' introduction to the special issue</i>.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2021
Same author

Measuring attitudes as a complex system: <i>Structured thinking and support for the Canadian carbon tax</i>.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2021
Same author

A Novel Network Approach to Capture Cognition and Affect: COVID-19 Experiences in Canada and Germany.

Frontiers in psychology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.2K

Social cues and ideology.

Jordan Mansell1

  • 1University of Oxford.

Politics and the Life Sciences : the Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
|May 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Political ideology influences trust. Democrats value shared beliefs, increasing trust, while Republicans distrust those with differing values, impacting social interactions and decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Political Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Ideological differences (liberal vs. conservative) correlate with distinct social values regarding change and inequality.
  • Biological factors, including heredity, are linked to the expression of these differing values.
  • Existing research suggests ideological orientation influences cognition and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if differing social values linked to political ideologies represent alternative strategies for maximizing social interaction returns.
  • To examine how knowledge of shared and unshared social values affects trust in anonymous social partners among Democrats and Republicans.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an American sample comprising Democrats and Republicans.
Keywords:
Ideologybehavioral adaptationexperimental interactionpolitical biologytraitstrustvalues

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.5K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.2K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.5K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

8.6K
  • Assessed the impact of implicit social attitudes (shared and unshared values) on trust.
  • Measured willingness to trust an anonymous social partner based on value alignment.

    • Main Results:

    • Knowledge of shared values significantly boosted trust among Democrats, but not Republicans.
    • Awareness of unshared values significantly decreased trust among Republicans, but not Democrats.
    • Findings align with research linking ideological differences to variations in cognition and decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Social value expression associated with political ideology may reflect distinct strategies for navigating social interactions.
    • Democrats appear to prioritize shared values for trust, while Republicans react more strongly to unshared values.
    • These results highlight the role of social values and cognitive differences in political polarization and trust dynamics.