Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Single-Center Retrospective Study of Risk Factors and Predictive Value of Framingham Risk Score of Patients with ST
Sohail Ikram1, Ajay Pachika1, Henrike Schuster1
1From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
Insights
The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) inadequately identifies patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study highlights the need for diverse risk assessment tools and consideration of non-traditional factors for accurate STEMI risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Risk Assessment
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) poses a significant cardiovascular risk.
- Accurate identification and risk stratification of STEMI patients are crucial for timely intervention.
- Traditional risk scores may not fully capture the complexity of STEMI development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify risk factors and clinical profiles of patients with STEMI.
- To evaluate the utility of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for pre-event risk identification in STEMI patients.
- To assess the effectiveness of FRS in risk stratification for STEMI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics of STEMI patients.
- Calculation of cardiovascular event risk using FRS in a subset of patients without prior coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus.
- Evaluation of FRS accuracy in identifying and stratifying STEMI risk.
Main Results:
- The study included 44 STEMI patients (75% male, 80% white, mean age 56 ± 10 years).
- Predominant risk factors were cigarette smoking (83%), hypertension (77%), and dyslipidemia (68%).
- Calculated FRS averaged 14.1% ± 5.8%, with 36% of patients having a 10-year risk >20% and 63% between 10%-20%.
Conclusions:
- The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was inadequate for correctly identifying and risk-stratifying the majority of STEMI patients.
- Emphasizes the importance of utilizing multiple, applicable risk scores based on individual patient characteristics.
- Recommends considering non-traditional risk factors and coronary artery calcium scoring for improved STEMI risk assessment.
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to identify risk factors and clinical profile of the patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We further evaluated the utility of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in the accurate identification of these patients if used before their coronary event.
Methods:
We evaluated the demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics of patients admitted with STEMI. We also calculated cardiovascular event risk using the FRS in a subset of patients without prior known coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.
Results:
A total of 44 patients, predominantly men (75%) and white (80%), with a mean age of 56 ± 10 years, were included in our analysis. Cigarette smoking was the predominant risk factor (83%) followed by hypertension (77%) and dyslipidemia (68%). The calculated FRS in a subset of patients without prior coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus was 14.1% ± 5.8%. Based on the FRS, 8 (36%) patients had a 10-year risk >20% and 14 (63%) patients had a 10-year risk between 10% and 20%.
Conclusions:
In a series of consecutive patients with STEMI, we observed that high FRS was inadequate in correct identification and risk stratification of the majority of patients who had STEMI. Our study underlines the importance of being familiar with multiple risk scores and choosing the most applicable risk score based on the patient's individual characteristics. In addition, it is important to take into consideration the nontraditional risk factors or measurement of coronary artery calcium as a part of the risk assessment algorithm.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Relative Risk
Patient-centered Care
Other Factors Affecting Respiration Centers
However, the ability to hold one's breath voluntarily is not limitless. When the CO2 concentration in the blood reaches a critical...
Chemical Factors Affecting Respiration Centers
CO2 has a potent influence on respiration and is strictly regulated....
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

