ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache-Child

, Laura L Hayes1, Susan Palasis2

  • 1Principal Author, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.

Insights

Choosing the right neuroimaging for pediatric headaches is crucial. This report offers evidence-based guidelines to select appropriate imaging, minimizing risk while diagnosing the cause.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Headaches are common in children and stem from diverse causes.
  • Neuroimaging selection for pediatric headaches must be specific to the headache type.
  • Appropriate initial imaging is essential for accurate diagnosis and minimizing child risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss various headache types in children.
  • To provide evidence-based guidelines for neuroimaging in pediatric headaches.
  • To optimize the selection of initial imaging examinations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
  • Conducted an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed medical literature.
  • Applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and GRADE methodology.
  • Incorporated expert opinion where evidence was lacking or equivocal.

Main Results:

  • Established specific guidelines for neuroimaging based on headache type in children.
  • Differentiated imaging appropriateness for various pediatric headache presentations.
  • Emphasized the importance of tailored imaging protocols.

Conclusions:

  • Appropriate neuroimaging selection is key for diagnosing pediatric headaches effectively.
  • Guidelines aid clinicians in choosing the most suitable imaging with minimal risk.
  • This evidence-based approach supports optimal patient care for pediatric headache patients.

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule01:20

Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule

Like benzene, cyclobutadiene and cyclooctatetraene are cyclic compounds with alternate single and double bonds. However, their chemical behavior differs from benzene, as they are unstable and not aromatic. So, what are the structural characteristics of unsaturated compounds categorized as aromatic?  
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n +...
13.5K
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress01:25

Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress

In designing structural elements and machine parts using ductile materials, it is crucial to ensure that these components withstand applied stresses without yielding. Yielding is initially determined through a tensile test, which evaluates the material's response to uniaxial stress. However, tensile stress is insufficient when components face biaxial or plane stress conditions This condition requires advanced criteria to predict failure.
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
575
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
44.4K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

Overview
125.7K