Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Harmonic Mean01:09

Harmonic Mean

3.8K
The arithmetic mean is usually skewed towards the larger values in the data set. Therefore, to avoid this inherent bias towards smaller values, the harmonic mean is used.
Take the example of the speed of a car, which is the measure of the rate of distance traveled. If the vehicle traverses the same distance back-and-forth, its average speed equals the total distance traveled divided by the total time taken. However, if the car moves with varying speeds, then the arithmetic mean is more skewed...
3.8K
Simple Harmonic Motion01:21

Simple Harmonic Motion

15.4K
Simple harmonic motion is the name given to oscillatory motion for a system where the net force can be described by Hooke's law. If the net force can be described by Hooke's law and there is no damping (by friction or other non-conservative forces), then a simple harmonic oscillator will oscillate with equal displacement on either side of the equilibrium position. To derive an equation for period and frequency, the equation of motion is used. The period of a simple harmonic oscillator is given...
15.4K
Energy in Simple Harmonic Motion01:23

Energy in Simple Harmonic Motion

13.0K
To determine the energy of a simple harmonic oscillator, consider all the forms of energy it can have during its simple harmonic motion. According to Hooke's Law, the energy stored during the compression/stretching of a string in a simple harmonic oscillator is potential energy. As the simple harmonic oscillator has no dissipative forces, it also possesses kinetic energy. In the presence of conservative forces, both energies can interconvert during oscillation, but the total energy remains...
13.0K
Characteristics of Simple Harmonic Motion01:17

Characteristics of Simple Harmonic Motion

18.0K
The key characteristic of the simple harmonic motion is that the acceleration of the system and, therefore, the net force are proportional to the displacement and act in the opposite direction to the displacement. Additionally, the period and frequency of a simple harmonic oscillator are independent of its amplitude. For example, diving boards move faster or slower based on their thickness. A stiff, thick diving board has a large force constant, which causes it to have a smaller period, while a...
18.0K
Problem Solving: Energy in Simple Harmonic Motion01:17

Problem Solving: Energy in Simple Harmonic Motion

2.2K
Simple harmonic motion (SHM) is a type of periodic motion in time and position, in which an object oscillates back and forth around an equilibrium position with a constant amplitude and frequency. In SHM, there is a continuous exchange between the potential and kinetic energy, which results in the oscillation of the object.
Consider the spring in a shock absorber of a car. The spring attached to the wheel executes simple harmonic motion while the car is moving on a bumpy road. The force on the...
2.2K
Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion01:42

Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion

5.7K
While simple harmonic motion and uniform circular motion may be two separate concepts, they correlate and interlink with each other. Simple harmonic motion is an oscillatory motion in a system where the net force can be described by Hooke's law, while uniform circular motion is the motion of an object in a circular path at constant speed.
There is an easy way to produce simple harmonic motion by using uniform circular motion. For instance, consider a ball attached to a uniformly rotating...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum: DiffuseRT: predicting likely anatomical deformations of patients undergoing radiotherapy (2024<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i> 69 155016).

Physics in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

DiffuseRT: predicting likely anatomical deformations of patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Potential no man's land for the 4<sup>th</sup> year dental graduate.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

A systematic review of the outcomes of using voice hearing simulation in the education of health care professionals and those in training.

Nurse education today·2020
Same author

Optimal treatment plan adaptation using mid-treatment imaging biomarkers.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same author

Sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase (SGPL1) deficiency is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Harmonic Nanoparticles for Regenerative Research
09:23

Harmonic Nanoparticles for Regenerative Research

Published on: May 1, 2014

12.1K

A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.

M Namías1,2, T Bradshaw3, V O Menezes4

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, Fundación Centro Diagnóstico Nuclear, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|May 5, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a simpler method for harmonizing Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners using basic cylindrical phantoms. This approach achieves accurate quantitative PET imaging, crucial for treatment response biomarkers, without complex equipment.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy
09:19

Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy

Published on: August 29, 2025

630
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Harmonic Nanoparticles for Regenerative Research
09:23

Harmonic Nanoparticles for Regenerative Research

Published on: May 1, 2014

12.1K
Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy
09:19

Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy

Published on: August 29, 2025

630
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
06:31

Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Medical Imaging
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) enables in vivo measurement of radiotracer concentrations, vital for monitoring treatment response via quantitative changes in tracer uptake.
  • PET quantification is significantly influenced by reconstruction algorithms and settings, necessitating scanner harmonization for reliable results.
  • Current harmonization methods often require complex phantoms, limiting accessibility for some institutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel, simplified harmonization methodology for quantitative PET imaging.
  • To demonstrate that this new method, using simple cylindrical phantoms, can match the performance of complex harmonization techniques.
  • To facilitate easier adoption of quantitative PET harmonization, aligning with accreditation programs like EARL FDG-PET/CT.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a harmonization methodology utilizing simple cylindrical phantoms for resolution and noise measurements.
  • Simulated NEMA image quality phantom spherical inserts using data from cylindrical phantoms.
  • Employed an optimization algorithm to identify optimal smoothing filters for harmonizing PET scanners across different models and institutions.

Main Results:

  • The methodology accurately predicted contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) from NEMA phantoms with errors within ±5.2% for CRCmax and ±3.7% for CRCmean.
  • Post-harmonization, all CRC values met EANM tolerances.
  • Achieved quantitative harmonization compliant with the EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation program.

Conclusions:

  • A novel, simplified PET scanner harmonization methodology using cylindrical phantoms is effective and accurate.
  • This approach eliminates the need for complex NEMA phantoms, simplifying workflows.
  • The proposed method enhances accessibility to standardized quantitative PET imaging, particularly for smaller institutions.