Nasotracheal Intubation: The Preferred Airway in Oral Cavity Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery?

We aimed to describe the safety and effectiveness of nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in a cohort of patients undergoing reconstruction of oral cavity defects with free tissue transfer (FTT).

We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample composed of consecutive patients undergoing FTT reconstruction of oral cavity, maxillary, or mandibular defects between 2013 and 2017. These patients were all subject to a newly developed enhanced recovery-after-surgery protocol. The primary outcome measurement was hospital length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcome variables were the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, need for gastrostomy, and airway-related complications directly associated with either NTI or tracheostomy. Descriptive statistics and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were completed.

The sample was composed of 141 patients who had undergone oral cavity FTT for both benign and malignant diseases (NTI, n = 111; tracheostomy, n = 30). Patients managed with NTI had a statistically significantly shorter hospital LOS (8 days vs 15.5 days, P < .0001) and ICU LOS (1 day vs 2 days, P = .0006), as well as a decreased requirement for gastrostomy (17.1% vs 76.7%, P < .0001). Airway-related complications were rare in both the tracheostomy (13.3%) and NTI (3.6%) groups. Multivariate analysis showed that patients undergoing tracheostomy were 3.14 (P = .004) times more likely to have a prolonged hospitalization and 10.4 (P < .0001) times more likely to require a gastrostomy. A sensitivity analysis of only patients with malignant diagnoses had similar statistically significant results. The delayed tracheostomy rate in the NTI group was 3.6%.

To date, this is the largest study to evaluate the use of NTI in patients undergoing oral cavity reconstruction with FTT. Our results suggest that in the appropriate institutional setting, most patients can be safely managed with NTI. This approach results in a decreased hospital LOS and ICU LOS and an earlier resumption of oral intake with less need for gastrostomy.