Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026
A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation
Published on: July 26, 2017
Comparison of Infrapubic vs Penoscrotal Approaches for 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: Do We Have a
Franco Palmisano1, Luca Boeri1, Cristiano Cristini2
1Department of Urology, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Background:
The 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the gold standard treatment for male erectile dysfunction when other less invasive approaches are contra-indicated or unacceptable for the patient. There are currently 2 surgical approaches for IPP implantation: the penoscrotal (PS) and the infrapubic (IP) incision.
Aim:
To assess the most recent evidence on the impact of surgical approach for 3-piece IPP implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction.
Methods:
A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Libraries databases in November 2017 to identify all studies investigating 3-piece IPP with a specified surgical access.
Outcomes:
The following key words were used in combination: "infrapubic," "transcrotal," "penoscrotal," "peno-scrotal," and "penile prosthesis." Additional references were obtained from the reference lists of full-text manuscripts. We used a narrative synthesis for the analyses of the studies.
Results:
22 Studies reporting data on 3-piece IPP implantation with a specified surgical approach were found in the literature. While IPPs are most commonly positioned through a PS incision, the IP approach is a faster procedure. No cases of glans hypoesthesia after IPP placement with an IP approach were reported, and the overall peri-prosthetic infection rate was 3.3% or less. Patient satisfaction rates were higher than 80% in both groups.
Conclusions:
Both the IP and PS approaches are viable and effective strategies for a 3-piece IPP placement, and result in high satisfaction rates. To date there is no evidence that an incision strategy may reduce infection rates. Penile sensory loss following an IP approach remains a virtual risk. It is recommended that the surgeon executing the implant have knowledge of both accesses and be capable of tailoring the incision strategy for complex cases. The chosen method should be based on the patient's specific anatomy, surgical history, and surgeon experience. Palmisano F, Boeri L, Cristini C, et al. Comparison of Infrapubic vs Penoscrotal Approaches for 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: Do We Have a Winner? Sex Med Rev 2018;6:631-639.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Oxygen Delivering System III: Tracheostomy and T-piece
Tracheostomy
A tracheostomy is a surgically created opening (stoma) in the anterior part of the trachea. It is used to establish a patient airway, bypass an upper airway obstruction, simplify the removal of secretions, permit long-term...
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
02:54Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
01:24Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
01:24Comparison between RL and RC circuits