Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Coronary flow reserve in systemic rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gian Luca Erre1, Giorgio Buscetta2, Panagiotis Paliogiannis3
1UOC Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari e Università di Sassari, Viale San Pietro 8, 07100, Sassari, Italy. e.gianluca@libero.it.
Insights
Patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) exhibit significantly lower coronary flow reserve (CFR) compared to healthy individuals. This impaired CFR suggests microvascular dysfunction in RDs, influenced by disease-specific mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Rheumatology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Coronary flow reserve (CFR) assesses coronary artery disease and microvascular function.
- Limited data exists on CFR in systemic rheumatic diseases (RDs).
- A comprehensive review is needed to consolidate evidence on CFR in RDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze studies on CFR in RDs.
- To increase statistical power by pooling data from small studies.
- To investigate associations between RDs and CFR.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (inception to March 2018).
- Inclusion of 21 studies (709 RDs patients, 650 controls).
- Meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMD) and meta-regressions.
Main Results:
- Pooled CFR was significantly lower in RDs patients versus controls (SMD = -1.51).
- No association found between CFR differences and inflammation, age, lipids, BMI, or BP.
- Autoimmune RDs showed lower CFR than mixed autoimmune/autoinflammatory RDs.
Conclusions:
- Significant CFR impairment exists in patients with RDs.
- Pathogenetic differences may explain varying CFR severity in RDs.
- This highlights potential cardiovascular risks in rheumatic disease populations.
Abstract:
Coronary flow reserve (CFR), a measure of both obstructive coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction, has been evaluated in systemic rheumatic diseases (RDs), but a comprehensive critical appraisal of the available evidence is lacking. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with small sample size investigating the associations between the presence of RDs and CFR to increase statistical power and accuracy. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, from inception to March 2018, were searched for studies reporting on CFR in RDs in comparison to healthy subjects. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Meta-regressions and sensitivity analyses assessed study heterogeneity by type of RDs, age, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, systemic inflammation, and methodology used to evaluate CFR. Twenty-one studies (709 RDs patients and 650 healthy controls) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that CFR values were significantly lower in patients with RDs than in healthy controls (SMD = - 1.51, 95% CI - 1.91, - 1.11; p < 0.001; I2 = 90.1%, p < 0.001). The between-group differences in CFR were not associated with inflammatory burden, age, lipids, body mass index, blood pressure, or assessment methods. Patients with prevalent autoimmune features (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus) showed a significantly lower CFR when compared to patients with mixed autoimmune and autoinflammatory features (e.g., psoriatic arthritis). This meta-analysis showed a significant impairment in CFR in patients with RDs with respect to the general population. Differences in pathogenetic mechanisms may influence the severity of CFR impairment in RDs.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

