Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

15.8K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
15.8K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.8K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.8K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

653
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
653

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preventing premature deaths through polygenic risk scores.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A systematic evaluation of the performance and properties of the UK Biobank Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release.

PloS one·2024
Same author

The Women4Health cohort: a unique cohort to study women-specific mechanisms of cardio-metabolic regulation.

European heart journal open·2024
Same author

Plasma Protein Profiling of Incident Cardiovascular Diseases: A Multisample Evaluation.

Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine·2023
Same author

<i>CXCL12</i> drives natural variation in coronary artery anatomy across diverse populations.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023
Same author

Plasma proteomic signatures of a direct measure of insulin sensitivity in two population cohorts.

Diabetologia·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

A Pathway Association Study Tool for GWAS Analyses of Metabolic Pathway Information
05:01

A Pathway Association Study Tool for GWAS Analyses of Metabolic Pathway Information

Published on: July 1, 2020

3.8K

Transethnic differences in GWAS signals: A simulation study.

Daniela Zanetti1,2, Michael E Weale3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.

Annals of Human Genetics
|May 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) reveal that allele frequency and linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences largely explain varying GWAS signals across populations. True effect size differences are less likely, supporting transethnic fine-mapping strategies.

Keywords:
Causal SNPcomplex human diseasesgenome-wide association studiestransethnic differences

More Related Videos

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.9K
Study of Siphon Breaker Experiment and Simulation for a Research Reactor
08:45

Study of Siphon Breaker Experiment and Simulation for a Research Reactor

Published on: September 26, 2017

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

A Pathway Association Study Tool for GWAS Analyses of Metabolic Pathway Information
05:01

A Pathway Association Study Tool for GWAS Analyses of Metabolic Pathway Information

Published on: July 1, 2020

3.8K
Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.9K
Study of Siphon Breaker Experiment and Simulation for a Research Reactor
08:45

Study of Siphon Breaker Experiment and Simulation for a Research Reactor

Published on: September 26, 2017

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Population Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) identify variants linked to complex traits.
  • Observed differences in GWAS signal strength and direction across populations are noted.
  • Potential causes include power, allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and true effect size variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if allele frequency and LD differences alone explain observed GWAS signal variations across ancestries.
  • To assess the impact of population-specific genetic architectures on GWAS findings.
  • To evaluate the role of Euro-centric SNP bias in historical GWAS results.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated case-control data for European, Asian, and African ancestries.
  • Incorporated realistic allele frequencies and LD data from the 1000 Genomes Project.
  • Enforced equal causal variant effect sizes across simulated populations.

Main Results:

  • Allele frequency and LD differences substantially account for variations in strong GWAS signals across populations.
  • Euro-centric SNP bias and limited SNP coverage in older panels exacerbated these differences.
  • Simulations suggest that true transethnic effect size differences may play a smaller role than previously assumed.

Conclusions:

  • Genetic architecture differences, primarily allele frequency and LD, explain much of the observed transethnic GWAS signal variation.
  • These findings support the hypothesis that causal variant effects are largely conserved across human populations.
  • The study advocates for leveraging transethnic data in fine-mapping efforts to enhance discovery and understanding.