Is Fractional Flow Reserve Useful in Assessing Coronary Artery Fistula: A Case-Based Discussion and Review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Samual Hayman1, Aashish Goela1, Shahar Lavi1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) use in managing coronary artery fistulas (CAF) may not accurately reflect fistula significance. Current findings suggest FFR primarily assesses coronary artery disease, not coronary steal, questioning its routine application in CAF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Coronary artery fistula (CAF) is a congenital heart defect with variable clinical presentations, ranging from asymptomatic to severe syndromes.
- Management decisions for CAF, including surgical or percutaneous closure, are often challenging due to unclear indications.
- Quantifying the physiological significance of a CAF is crucial for guiding appropriate treatment strategies.
Observation:
- This study presents two cases where fractional flow reserve (FFR) was employed to guide the management of coronary artery fistulas (CAF).
- The application of FFR in this context is based on recent case study recommendations advocating its use.
- The primary observation was to evaluate FFR's utility in assessing the physiological impact of CAF.
Findings:
- FFR measurements in these cases appeared to reflect concomitant epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) rather than the degree of coronary steal caused by the fistula.
- The study suggests that FFR may not be a reliable tool for quantifying the physiological significance of a CAF.
- Routine use of FFR for guiding CAF management is not supported by these findings.
Implications:
- The findings challenge the routine application of FFR in the assessment and management of coronary artery fistulas.
- Further research is needed to determine appropriate physiological measures for evaluating CAF significance.
- This study may influence clinical decision-making regarding the interventional or surgical treatment of CAFs.
Abstract:
We present two cases where fractional flow reserve (FFR) was utilised to guide management of coronary artery fistula (CAF), an approach advocated in recent case studies. CAF is a coronary anomaly that may present with a variety of syndromes though is frequently asymptomatic. When to exclude the fistula (surgically or percutaneously) is not always clear. A way to quantify if the fistula is physiologically meaningful would be advantageous. Our findings suggest FFR may only be assessing the concomitant epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) rather than the degree of coronary steal and its routine use in this setting is not supported.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

