Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

251
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
251
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.9K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.9K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A methodological assessment of randomization integrity in alteplase for acute ischemic stroke individual patient data meta-analyses.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The fundamentals of multiplicity adjustment in biostatistics.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2025
Same author

Steady-state statistical properties and implementation of randomization designs with maximum tolerated imbalance restriction for two-arm equal allocation clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

On "Re-randomization tests as sensitivity analyses to confirm immunological noninferiority of an investigational vaccine: Case study" by Luca Grassano et al. (2023, Pharmaceutical Statistics).

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

A roadmap to using randomization in clinical trials.

BMC medical research methodology·2021
Same author

Association Between Change in Visual Acuity and Change in Central Subfield Thickness During Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Participants Randomized to Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Protocol T Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA ophthalmology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.7K

Characterizing permuted block randomization as a big stick procedure.

Vance W Berger1, Isoken Odia2

  • 1National Cancer Institute and University of Maryland Baltimore County, Biometry Research Group, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
|May 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Permuted block randomization and MTI procedures use a "big stick" to maintain balance in clinical trials. MTI procedures offer superior, restrained balance control compared to traditional block randomization.

Keywords:
Big stickBlocked randomizationMaximal procedure

More Related Videos

Functionalization of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermo-reversible Block Copolymers and Characterization by Small-angle Neutron Scattering
09:12

Functionalization of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermo-reversible Block Copolymers and Characterization by Small-angle Neutron Scattering

Published on: June 1, 2016

9.5K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.7K
Functionalization of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermo-reversible Block Copolymers and Characterization by Small-angle Neutron Scattering
09:12

Functionalization of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermo-reversible Block Copolymers and Characterization by Small-angle Neutron Scattering

Published on: June 1, 2016

9.5K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Design

Background:

  • Permuted block randomization is a widely used method for allocating patients to treatment groups.
  • Maximally tolerated imbalance (MTI) procedures represent a newer class of randomization techniques gaining popularity.
  • Both approaches aim to ensure balance in treatment group allocation, but differ in their mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the "big stick" mechanism in both permuted block randomization and MTI procedures.
  • To compare the effectiveness and weaknesses of different randomization strategies.
  • To introduce a novel intermediate randomization procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of "big stick" usage in block randomization and MTI procedures.
  • Identification and characterization of a new intermediate randomization procedure.
  • Theoretical argumentation based on the "big stick" concept and transitivity.

Main Results:

  • Permuted block randomization utilizes a "big stick" improperly, leading to excessive predictability and imbalance.
  • MTI procedures employ a "restrained big stick" for superior balance control.
  • A new intermediate procedure uses a powerful "big stick" only when necessary, outperforming block randomization but not MTI procedures.

Conclusions:

  • MTI procedures are superior to the intermediate procedure due to their "restrained big stick" approach.
  • The intermediate procedure is better than block randomization because it invokes the "big stick" more judiciously.
  • Proper and restrained use of the "big stick" is crucial for effective clinical trial randomization.