Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Dendrimer-based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: December 4, 2016
Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study
Jonathan R Dillman1, Alexander J Towbin1, Rebecca Imbus1
1From the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, ML 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45229.
Insights
Breeza and barium sulfate suspension offer similar small bowel distention for pediatric enterography. Patients preferred Breeza due to better taste and texture, leading to higher completion rates.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Pediatric Imaging
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Oral contrast agents are crucial for cross-sectional enterography.
- Optimizing patient acceptance and adherence is vital for successful pediatric imaging.
- Neutral contrast agents are preferred for computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare small bowel distention and patient acceptance of two neutral oral contrast materials in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate Breeza against a low-density barium sulfate suspension for cross-sectional enterography.
- To determine if Breeza offers superior taste and texture compared to barium sulfate suspension.
Main Methods:
- A noninferiority study randomized 66 pediatric patients to receive either Breeza or barium sulfate suspension.
- Patients rated taste, texture, and perceived health state; ingested volume was recorded.
- Maximum small bowel diameter was measured, and data were analyzed using t tests and Fisher exact tests.
Main Results:
- Both Breeza and barium sulfate suspension provided similar small bowel distention (mean diameter 1.63 cm vs 1.69 cm, P = .44).
- Significantly more patients completed the Breeza preparation (84.8%) compared to barium sulfate suspension (51.5%, P = .007).
- Breeza received higher scores for taste (P < .0001) and texture (P < .0001).
Conclusions:
- Breeza and low-density barium sulfate suspension are comparable in achieving adequate small bowel distention for pediatric enterography.
- Breeza demonstrates superior patient acceptance, evidenced by better taste and texture ratings.
- Improved patient acceptance of Breeza leads to higher adherence and completion rates, enhancing imaging quality.
Abstract:
Purpose To prospectively compare small bowel distention provided by, as well as patient acceptance of, two different neutral (negative) oral contrast materials used for cross-sectional enterography in a pediatric population. Materials and Methods In this noninferiority study, 66 pediatric patients undergoing clinical computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) enterography were randomized to receive either a flavored beverage for neutral abdominal and pelvic imaging (Breeza; Beekley Medical, Bristol, Conn) or a low-density barium sulfate suspension. Patients were blinded to the oral contrast material administered and were asked to rate taste, texture, and their perceived health state (where 0 was very bad and 10 was very good). Ingested volume of the prescribed weight-based oral contrast material preparation was recorded. Maximum small bowel diameter was measured in all four abdominal quadrants. Mean bowel diameter as well as taste, texture, and health state scores were compared between cohorts by using t tests; proportions were compared by using Fisher exact tests. Results Thirty-three patients each received Breeza and barium sulfate suspension, respectively. No difference was found in age (Breeza, 13.5 years ± 2.6 [standard deviation]; barium sulfate suspension, 13.9 years ± 2.8; P = .49), sex distribution (15 girls each; P > .99), or health state (P = .21) between cohorts. Twenty-eight of 33 (84.8%) and 17 of 33 (51.5%) patients completed the Breeza and barium sulfate suspension preparations, respectively (P = .007). Breeza received higher scores for taste (6.1 ± 2.5 vs 2.7 ± 2.5; P < .0001) and texture (7.3 ± 2.3 vs 3.6 ± 2.9; P < .0001). No difference was found in bowel distention between Breeza and barium sulfate suspension (1.63 cm ± 0.24 vs 1.69 cm ± 0.25; P = .44). Conclusion The neutral oral contrast materials Breeza and low-density barium sulfate suspension provide similar small bowel distention. Patients receiving Breeza are more likely to ingest the entire prescribed volume.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

