Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Self-Limiting versus Conventional Caries Removal: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A H Ali1,2, G Koller1,3,4, F Foschi1,3
11 Conservative & MI Dentistry (including Endodontics), King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's Hospital, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
A self-limiting caries excavation technique using chemomechanical gel and magnification significantly improved pulp survival rates compared to conventional rotary bur methods. This minimally invasive approach offers better outcomes for deep caries treatment.
Area of Science:
- Restorative Dentistry
- Caries Management
- Pulp Biology
Background:
- Deep caries with reversible pulpitis presents a treatment challenge, balancing complete bacterial removal with pulp preservation.
- Conventional rotary bur excavation can lead to over-instrumentation and potential pulp exposure.
- Minimally invasive techniques aim to preserve healthy tooth structure and pulp vitality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of a self-limiting caries excavation protocol versus conventional selective dentin removal.
- To assess pulp sensibility, periapical health, and bacterial load after 12 months.
- To evaluate the efficacy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus periapical radiographs (PAs) in detecting periapical lesions.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 86 patients with deep caries and reversible pulpitis.
- Intervention: Self-limiting excavation using chemomechanical gel (Carisolv) and operating microscope.
- Control: Selective removal to leathery dentin using rotary burs, followed by mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulp protection and restoration in a single visit.
- Assessments included pulp sensibility, periapical health (CBCT/PAs), and bacterial tissue concentration via qPCR at 12 months.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in bacterial tissue concentration between the self-limiting (96.3% reduction) and control (97.1%) groups.
- The self-limiting protocol showed a 4-fold higher probability of 12-month success (odds ratio = 4.33) and improved pulp survival rates (90% vs. 73.3%).
- Molars had a significantly higher probability of success than premolars (odds ratio = 4.17). CBCT detected more periapical lesions than PAs at baseline.
Conclusions:
- The self-limiting caries excavation protocol significantly increases the pulp survival rate compared to conventional rotary bur excavation.
- This minimally invasive approach, utilizing chemomechanical agents and magnification, is a viable and effective treatment for deep caries with reversible pulpitis.
- CBCT is superior to PAs for baseline periapical lesion detection in this patient population.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Limiting Reactant
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Trial and Error and Algorithm

