Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Impact of Lesion Load Thresholds on Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score in Diffusion-Weighted
Julian Schröder1, Bastian Cheng1, Caroline Malherbe1,2
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf- und Neurozentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Automated assessment of ischemic lesions using Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows low agreement with visual ratings. Dichotomized scoring improves comparability, impacting patient selection for acute stroke treatment.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) guides acute stroke treatment.
- The precise lesion load threshold for defining ischemic regions in DWI-ASPECTS remains undefined.
- This study investigates the impact of varying lesion load thresholds on DWI-ASPECTS and compares automated analysis to visual assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the effect of different lesion load thresholds on DWI-ASPECTS.
- To compare automated DWI-ASPECTS calculations with visual ratings by stroke neurologists.
- To evaluate how lesion load thresholds influence patient selection for acute stroke interventions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of DWI lesions from 315 stroke patients against a probabilistic ASPECTS template.
- Application of multiple lesion load thresholds (>0%, >1%, >10%, >20%) per DWI-ASPECTS region.
- Comparison of automated DWI-ASPECTS scores with visual ratings by an experienced stroke neurologist.
Main Results:
- Automated DWI-ASPECTS varied significantly with lesion load thresholds, yielding median scores of 1, 5, 8, and 10 for >0%, >1%, >10%, and >20% thresholds, respectively.
- Overall agreement between automated and visual scoring was low across all thresholds (κw range: 0.020–0.386).
- Dichotomized scoring (≤7 or ≤5) showed fair to substantial agreement (κ range: 0.45–0.695), particularly with higher thresholds (>10%, >20%).
Conclusions:
- Automated DWI-ASPECTS assessment shows low agreement with visual scoring, irrespective of the lesion load threshold.
- Dichotomized scoring approaches yield more comparable results to visual assessment.
- The choice of lesion load threshold critically impacts patient selection for acute stroke treatment, highlighting the need for standardization.
Related Concept Videos
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Impact Loading on a Cantilever Beam
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
Diffusion
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...

