Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Cereal Crop Ear Counting in Field Conditions Using Zenithal RGB Images
Published on: February 2, 2019
[Modeling evapotranspiration of greenhouse tomato under different water conditions based on the dual crop coefficient
Xue Wen Gong1,2, Hao Liu1, Jing Sheng Sun1
1Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory for Crop Water Requirement and Regulation, Institute of Farmland Irrigation Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China.
Abstract:
An experiment was conducted to investigate soil evaporation (E), crop transpiration (T), evapotranspiration (ET) and the ratio of evaporation to evapotranspiration (E/ET) of drip-irrigated tomato, which was planted in a typical solar greenhouse in the North China, under different water conditions [irrigation amount was determined based on accumulated pan evaporation (Ep) of 20 cm pan evaporation, and two treatments were designed with full irrigation (0.9Ep) and deficit irrigation (0.5Ep)] at different growth stages in 2015 and 2016 at Xinxiang Comprehensive Experimental Station, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Effects of deficit irrigation on crop coefficient (Kc) and variation of water stress coefficient (Ks) throughout the growing season were also discussed. E, T and ET of tomato were calculated with a dual crop coefficient approach, and compared with the measured data. Results indicated that E in the full irrigation was 21.5% and 20.4% higher than that in the deficit irrigation in 2015 and 2016, respectively, accounting for 24.0% and 25.0% of ET in the whole growing season. The maximum E/ET was measured in the initial stage of tomato, while the minimum obtained in the middle stage. The Kc the full irrigation was 0.45, 0.89, 1.06 and 0.93 in the initial, development, middle, and late stage of tomato, and 0.45, 0.89, 0.87 and 0.41 the deficit irrigation. The Ks the deficit irrigation was 0.98, 0.93, 0.78 and 0.39 in the initial, development, middle, and late stage, respectively. The dual crop coefficient method could accurately estimate ET of greenhouse tomato under different water conditions in 2015 and 2016 seasons with the mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.36-0.48 mm·d-1, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.44-0.65 mm·d-1. The method also estimated E and T accurately with MAE of 0.15-0.19 and 0.26-0.56 mm·d-1, and with RMSE of 0.20-0.24 and 0.33-0.72 mm·d-1, respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Water: A Bronsted-Lowry Acid and Base
Coefficient of Variation
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Confidence Coefficient
Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient is a measure of the deviation from ideal behavior. When the ionic strength of the solution is minimal, the activity coefficient of an ionic species is close to unity, making...
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

