Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gene-Environment Interactions01:20

Gene-Environment Interactions

1.2K
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
1.2K
Sleepwalking and Sleep Talking01:17

Sleepwalking and Sleep Talking

1.0K
Somnambulism, commonly known as sleepwalking, involves individuals engaging in activities ranging from simple walking to more complex behaviors such as driving. Sleepwalking typically occurs during the slow-wave sleep stages 3 and 4 early in the night when the person is not dreaming, contradicting the myth that sleepwalkers are acting out their dreams.
Factors that increase the likelihood of sleepwalking include sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption. Contrary to common beliefs, it is safe...
1.0K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

21.7K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.7K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.7K
Export of Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Genes02:19

Export of Mitochondrial and Chloroplast Genes

4.2K
A eukaryotic cell can have up to three different types of genetic systems: nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast. During evolution, organelles have exported many genes to the nucleus; this transfer is still ongoing in some plant species. Approximately 18% of the Arabidopsis thaliana nuclear genome is thought to be derived from the chloroplast’s cyanobacterial ancestor, and around 75% of the yeast genome derived from the mitochondria’s bacterial ancestor. This export has occurred...
4.2K
Cell Specific Gene Expression01:58

Cell Specific Gene Expression

16.6K
Multicellular organisms contain a variety of structurally and functionally distinct cell types, but the DNA in all the cells originated from the same parent cells. The differences in the cells can be attributed to the differential gene expression. Liver cells, whose functions include detoxification of blood, production of bile to metabolize fats, and synthesis of proteins essential for metabolism, must express a specific set of genes to perform their functions. Gene expression also varies with...
16.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Components of evolutionary psychology are falsifiable, but does that make it a good theory? Commentary on Costello et al. (2026).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

L-β-aminoisobutyric acid (L-BAIBA) in combination with voluntary wheel running exercise enhances musculoskeletal properties in middle-age male mice.

Aging·2025
Same author

Introduction to the Special Issue on Developmental Plasticity in Early Human Development.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2025
Same author

Minding the gap: a sex difference in young infants' mental rotation through thirty degrees of arc.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

How do babies come to know what babies know?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

On the evolution of epigenetics via exaptation: A developmental systems perspective.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Gene-environment Interaction Models to Unmask Susceptibility Mechanisms in Parkinson's Disease
08:09

Gene-environment Interaction Models to Unmask Susceptibility Mechanisms in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: January 7, 2014

8.0K

Gene × Environment interaction: What exactly are we talking about?

David S Moore1

  • 1Pitzer College and Claremont Graduate University, United States.

Research in Developmental Disabilities
|May 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Psychological scientists often confuse statistical interactions with physical interactions. Statistical interactions, like Genotype × Environment interactions, do not prove physical gene-environment interactions crucial for behavioral development.

Keywords:
ANOVACausal-mechanical interactionsGenotype × Environment interactions

More Related Videos

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
15:30

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

12.5K
Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis
11:29

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis

Published on: December 18, 2014

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Gene-environment Interaction Models to Unmask Susceptibility Mechanisms in Parkinson's Disease
08:09

Gene-environment Interaction Models to Unmask Susceptibility Mechanisms in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: January 7, 2014

8.0K
A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions
15:30

A Telemetric, Gravimetric Platform for Real-Time Physiological Phenotyping of Plant–Environment Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

12.5K
Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis
11:29

Novel 3D/VR Interactive Environment for MD Simulations, Visualization and Analysis

Published on: December 18, 2014

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • The term "interaction" in psychological science has dual meanings: physical interactions within systems and statistical interactions from models like ANOVA.
  • Statistical interactions indicate a third variable influences the relationship between two others, but don't imply physical mechanisms.
  • Behavioral genetics studies may find statistical Genotype × Environment interactions, but these findings offer limited insight into actual physical gene-environment interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the distinction between statistical and physical interactions in psychological research.
  • To highlight the importance of understanding physical interactions for explaining behavioral phenotypes.
  • To caution against over-interpreting statistical interactions in behavioral genetics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the term "interaction" in psychological science.
  • Review of traditional behavioral genetics methodologies and their interpretation of statistical interactions.
  • Emphasis on the mechanistic role of physical interactions in development.

Main Results:

  • A critical ambiguity exists in the scientific use of "interaction," leading to potential misinterpretation.
  • Statistical interactions (e.g., Genotype × Environment) are not direct evidence of underlying physical interactions.
  • Physical interactions between genes and their environment are the direct causes of behavioral phenotypes.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must carefully distinguish between statistical and physical interactions when interpreting findings, particularly in behavioral genetics.
  • Understanding the physical interactions between genes and their environment is essential for explaining the development of behavioral traits and disabilities.
  • Over-reliance on statistical interactions without considering physical mechanisms can hinder scientific progress in understanding complex behavioral phenotypes.