Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ambiguity in perception and experimentation.

D W Massaro1

  • 1Program in Experimental Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceiving affect from the voice and the face.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Letters are functional in word identification.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Modeling face identification processing in children and adults.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2001
Same author

Bayes factor of model selection validates FLMP.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1999

Researchers explored how people perceive depth using multiple visual cues. Findings suggest that while cues might be integrated, the exact process (additive vs. nonadditive) requires further investigation for a complete understanding of depth perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Perceived depth relies on integrating multiple monocular visual cues.
  • Previous research by Bruno and Cutting (1988) investigated this integration process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the conclusions drawn by Bruno and Cutting (1988) regarding depth cue integration.
  • To extend the fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP) to explain depth perception.
  • To compare additive and nonadditive integration models for depth cues.

Main Methods:

  • Factorial design manipulating four monocular depth cues.
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on subject distance judgments.
  • Re-analysis of judgment distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Extension and application of the fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP).

    • Main Results:

    • Bruno and Cutting's original analysis suggested cue integration but lacked evidence for additivity.
    • A re-analysis of judgment distributions provided some support for cue integration.
    • The extended FLMP, assuming nonadditive integration, and an additive model both explained the data equally well.

    Conclusions:

    • The original study's conclusions about cue integration and additivity are ambiguous.
    • The fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP) offers a framework for understanding depth cue integration.
    • Further research is needed to differentiate between additive and nonadditive integration models in depth perception.