Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Semi-quantitative dopamine transporter standardized uptake value in comparison with conventional specific binding
Yuichi Wakabayashi1, Ryuichi Takahashi2, Tomonori Kanda3
1Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan. baya318@gmail.com.
Purpose:
We developed a new analytical method to quantify the dopamine transporter (DAT) radiation dose in the striatum on [123I] FP-CIT single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). This method is based on the dopamine transporter standardized uptake value (DaTSUV). The purpose of this study was to compare DaTSUV with the classical specific binding ratio (SBR) in the discrimination of dopaminergic neurodegenerative diseases (dNDD) from non-dNDD.
Method:
Seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent DaTscan were included. Patients were divided into a dNDD group (n = 44; 24 men, 20 women; median age 73 years) and a non-dNDD group (n = 33; 14 men, 19 women; median age 75 years) based on their clinical diagnoses. The relationship between each method was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Differences in SBR and DaTSUV in each group were evaluated by t test. Pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to compare the discriminating abilities of each method according to the standard error of the area under the curve (AUC). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Result:
There was a significant strong correlation between DaTSUV and SBR (r = 0.910 [95% CI = 0.862-0.942], p < 0.001). The dNDD group showed significantly lower SBR (3.48 [1.25-7.91] vs 6.58 [3.81-11.1], p < 0.001) and DaTSUV (4.91 [1.59-13.6] vs 8.61 [2.29-15.6], p < 0.001) than the non-dNDD group. The discriminating ability of SBR (AUC = 0.918) was significantly higher than that of DaTSUV (AUC = 0.838, p = 0.0176).
Conclusion:
DaTSUV has a good correlation with SBR, but it could not exceed SBR for discriminating dNDD from non-dNDD.
More Related Videos
11:26Assessment of Dopaminergic Homeostasis in Mice by Use of High-performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis and Synaptosomal Dopamine Uptake
Published on: September 21, 2017
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Emission Spectra
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Electron Transport Chains
The ETC is comprised of...