Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Effects of Coronary Artery Revascularization with a Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated BioFreedom Stent Versus Bypass
Kyu Kim1, Choongki Kim1, Byeong Keuk Kim2
1Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Polymer-free BioFreedom stenting allows more patients to undergo major noncardiac surgery sooner and at a lower cost compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This revascularization strategy is feasible and safe for selected patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Patients requiring revascularization before major noncardiac surgery face treatment decisions impacting surgical timing and outcomes.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a traditional revascularization method, but its associated delays and resource utilization can be significant.
- Novel revascularization strategies are needed to optimize patient management in this setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of polymer-free drug-coated BioFreedom stent implantation versus CABG for revascularization prior to major noncardiac surgery.
- To evaluate key outcomes including the rate and timing of noncardiac surgery and composite adverse events.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter registry study involving 55 patients needing revascularization before non-delayed major noncardiac surgery.
- Patients were divided into two groups: BioFreedom stent implantation (n=27) and CABG (n=28).
- Primary outcomes assessed included noncardiac surgery rate, time to surgery, and a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, repeat revascularization, or major bleeding.
Main Results:
- A significantly higher rate of major noncardiac surgery was achieved with BioFreedom stenting (92.6%) compared to CABG (64.3%; p=0.027).
- Time from revascularization to noncardiac surgery was shorter with BioFreedom (38.0 days) versus CABG (73.0 days; p=0.042).
- The BioFreedom group experienced shorter hospital stays and lower treatment costs, with no significant difference in primary composite outcomes during the revascularization hospitalization or noncardiac surgery hospitalization.
Conclusions:
- Polymer-free BioFreedom stenting is a feasible and safe revascularization option before major noncardiac surgery in selected patients.
- This approach facilitates timely progression to noncardiac surgery and offers potential economic benefits.
- Further research may explore its application in patients with less severe coronary artery disease.
Purpose:
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polymer-free drug-coated BioFreedom stent implantation in comparison to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) before major noncardiac surgery.
Materials And Methods:
In a multicenter registry, 55 patients required revascularization before major noncardiac surgery that should not be delayed >6 months. Of them, 27 underwent BioFreedom stent implantation and 28 underwent CABG. Primary outcomes included rate of noncardiac surgery, time from revascularization to noncardiac surgery, and occurrence of composite outcomes (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, repeat revascularization, or major bleeding).
Results:
The rate of major noncardiac surgery was significantly higher in the BioFreedom group (92.6%) than in the CABG group (64.3%; p=0.027). Time from revascularization to noncardiac surgery was significantly shorter in the BioFreedom group (38.0 days) than in the CABG group (73.0 days; p=0.042). During the hospitalization for revascularization period, the occurrence of primary outcomes did not differ between the groups. However, the BioFreedom group showed a shorter hospitalization period and lower total treatment cost than the CABG group. During the hospital stay for noncardiac surgery, the occurrence of composite outcome was not significantly different between groups (4% vs. 0%; p>0.999): stroke occurred in only 1 case, and there were no cases of death or stent thrombosis in the BioFreedom group.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrated that BioFreedom stenting as a revascularization strategy before major noncardiac surgery might be feasible and safe in selected patients with less severe coronary artery diseases.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Polymers
Polymers
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

