Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
What is a Sensory System?01:31

What is a Sensory System?

101.4K
Sensory systems detect stimuli—such as light and sound waves—and transduce them into neural signals that can be interpreted by the nervous system. In addition to external stimuli detected by the senses, some sensory systems detect internal stimuli—such as the proprioceptors in muscles and tendons that send feedback about limb position.
101.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

46.1K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

17,18-epoxyeicosatetraenoic acid and its metabolite attenuate IL-33-induced airway inflammation involving group 2 innate lymphoid cells.

International immunology·2026
Same author

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Upper-Limb Motion Using EEG and EMG Signals: A Review.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Reduced masticatory stimuli modulate myokine secretion in the masseter muscle in mice.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Developing after COVID-19 Vaccination Managed with Long-Term Eculizumab Treatment: A Case Report.

Case reports in neurology·2026
Same author

Summary of Japanese clinical practice guidelines 2025 for the management of olfactory dysfunction.

Auris, nasus, larynx·2026
Same author

Decomposing Juggling Skill into Sequencing, Prediction, and Accuracy: A Computational Model with Low-Gravity VR Training.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Assessing the health risks of rice cadmium content standards in China" by H. Chu <i>et al</i>.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Developmental regulation of Erk signaling by mitotic kinases" by F. Chen <i>et al</i>.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Magnetically levitated metasurface enabling tangible and bidirectional human-machine interaction.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

A general photoinduced manganese-catalyzed platform for the sequential difunctionalization of [1.1.1]propellane.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Turning sound and force into light with AlN:Mn<sup>2+</sup> mechanoluminescence.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Extreme dominance of Earth-origin heavy ions in the intense ring current near the Earth during the May 2024 super geomagnetic storm.

Science advances·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.5K

Utilizing sensory prediction errors for movement intention decoding: A new methodology.

Gowrishankar Ganesh1, Keigo Nakamura1, Supat Saetia2

  • 1CNRS-AIST (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology) Joint Robotics Laboratory (JRL), UMI3218/RL, Tsukuba Central 1, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Japan.

Science Advances
|May 12, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel brain-computer interface method using subliminal sensory stimulation to decode human movement intentions from electroencephalography (EEG) signals. This approach significantly enhances decoding accuracy for movement prediction errors without user training or cognitive load.

More Related Videos

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

725
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.5K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

725
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • The brain utilizes forward models to predict sensory consequences of actions.
  • Decoding human movement intentions from brain activity is crucial for advanced assistive technologies.
  • Current methods often require extensive user training and may impose cognitive load.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a new methodology for decoding human movement intentions.
  • To leverage forward models and prediction errors for enhanced intention decoding.
  • To improve the accuracy and efficiency of brain-computer interfaces for movement intention detection.

Main Methods:

  • Proposing a method involving subliminal sensory stimulation of the modality relevant to the intended movement.
  • Decoding movement intentions by identifying prediction errors between expected and actual sensory feedback.
  • Utilizing electroencephalography (EEG) to capture brain responses to subliminal galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) during a wheelchair turning task.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a median single-trial decoding accuracy of 87.2% across participants.
  • Demonstrated high performance with zero user training and within 96 ms of stimulation.
  • Confirmed no additional cognitive load due to the subliminal nature of the stimulation.

Conclusions:

  • Subliminal sensory stimulation combined with prediction error decoding significantly improves movement intention detection from EEG.
  • This methodology offers a promising, efficient, and low-cognitive-load approach for brain-computer interfaces.
  • The findings have implications for developing intuitive control systems for assistive devices.