Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Pipeline for 3D Multimodality Image Integration and Computer-assisted Planning in Epilepsy Surgery
Published on: May 20, 2016
Is autopsy tissue a valid control for epilepsy surgery tissue in microRNA studies?
Paolo Roncon1, Silvia Zucchini1,2,3, Manuela Ferracin4
1Department of Medical Sciences Section of Pharmacology and Neuroscience Center University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy.
Abstract:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially expressed in the brain under pathologic conditions and may therefore represent both therapeutic targets and diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for neurologic diseases, including epilepsy. In fact, miRNA expression profiles have been investigated in the hippocampi of patients with epilepsy in comparison with control, nonepileptic cases. Unfortunately, the interpretation of these data is difficult because surgically resected epileptic tissue is generally compared with control tissue obtained from autopsies. To challenge the validity of this approach, we performed an miRNA microarray on the laser microdissected granule cell layer of the human hippocampus obtained from surgical samples of patients with epilepsy, autoptic nonepileptic controls, and patients with autoptic epilepsy, using the latter as internal control. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to collect autopsy material from documented epilepsy individuals who died of non-epilepsy-related causes-we found only two such cases. However, hierarchical clustering of all samples showed that those obtained from autopsies of patients with epilepsy segregated with the other autoptic samples (controls) and not with the bioptic tissues from the surgery patients, suggesting that the origin of the tissue (surgery or autopsy) may be prevalent over the underlying pathology (epilepsy or not epilepsy). Even taking into account the limitations due to the small number of cases, this observation arises concerns on the use of autopsy tissue as control for this kind of studies.
Insights
Autopsy tissue may not be a reliable control for epilepsy studies. MicroRNA profiles in autopsy samples, even from epilepsy patients, clustered separately from surgically resected tissues, suggesting tissue origin impacts results more than epilepsy itself.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- MicroRNAs (miRNAs) show altered expression in the brain during disease, making them potential biomarkers for neurologic conditions like epilepsy.
- Investigating miRNA expression in epilepsy often compares surgically resected tissue with autopsy samples, posing interpretation challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of using autopsy-derived tissue as a control for epilepsy-related microRNA studies.
- To determine if tissue origin (surgical vs. autopsy) influences microRNA expression profiles more than the presence of epilepsy.
Main Methods:
- MicroRNA microarray analysis was performed on laser microdissected hippocampal granule cells.
- Samples were obtained from surgically resected epilepsy patient tissue, autoptic nonepileptic controls, and autoptic epilepsy cases.
Main Results:
- Hierarchical clustering revealed that autopsy samples (both control and epilepsy) grouped together, separate from surgical epilepsy samples.
- This suggests tissue source, rather than epilepsy pathology, was the primary driver of observed microRNA expression patterns.
Conclusions:
- The use of autopsy tissue as a control in microRNA studies for epilepsy requires critical re-evaluation.
- Tissue origin significantly impacts microRNA profiles, raising concerns about the reliability of previous findings using autopsy controls.
Related Concept Videos
MicroRNAs
Tissues
Tissues
Plant Cells and Tissues
Plant Tissue Culture
Reliability and Validity

