Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026
Electrochemical Etching and Characterization of Sharp Field Emission Points for Electron Impact Ionization
Published on: July 12, 2016
In-vitro evaluation of bond strength of four self-etching cements
Julio Chávez-Lozada1, Carmen Urquía-Morales2
1Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Odontología, Cátedra de Operatoria I, Córdoba, Argentina. juliochavezlozada@yahoo.com.ar.
Abstract:
Indirect restorations need to be attached with adhesive luting agents to prevent them from becoming dislodged and provide adequate marginal sealing. The aim of this study was to evaluate bond strength to dentin of self-etching resin cements.
Materials And Methods:
75 flat dentin surfaces were randomly distributed among 5 groups, according to cements used; Group 1: RelyxU100 (3M/ESPE), Group 2: Bis Cem (Bisco), Group 3: Max Cem (Kerr), Group 4: SeT PP (SDI) and Group 5: Relyx ARC (3M/ESPE), control. Ceramic test cylinders (IPS Empress 2 / Ivoclar-Vivadent) 4.1 mm across were prepared and attached to the dentin surfaces using the different cements. A constant 25N load was applied for 1 minute and they were light-polymerized. Following storage for 24 hours at 100% humidity and 37 °C, the specimens were tested for bond strength under shear strain in an Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute; at 7, 14 and 21 days. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test. There were significant differences between materials (p < 0.0001), but not between times or material/time interaction. RelyXARC (Control Group) had the highest bond strength (15.52 MPa). Among the self-etching cements, the best behavior was found for Relyx U100 (10.80MPa), followed by BisCem (6.36 MPa), MaxCem (5.45 MPa) and SeTPP (3.17 MPa). The bond strength of the self-adhesive cements evaluated was lower than that for resin cements which require previous treatment of the dental substrate (control group). This should be taken into account during clinical selection, in particular for tooth preparations with poor retention.
More Related Videos
08:40Standard Test Method ASTM D 7998-19 for the Cohesive Strength Development of Wood Adhesives
Published on: May 17, 2020
08:31One-Step Approach to Fabricating Polydimethylsiloxane Microfluidic Channels of Different Geometric Sections by Sequential Wet Etching Processes
Published on: September 13, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:20Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
01:12Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
00:42Ionic Bonds
When atoms gain or lose electrons to achieve a more stable electron configuration they form ions. Ionic bonds are electrostatic attractions between ions with opposite charges. Ionic compounds are rigid and brittle when solid and may dissociate into their constituent ions in water. Covalent compounds, by contrast, remain intact unless a chemical reaction breaks them.
Opposing Charges Hold Ions Together in Ionic Compounds
Ionic bonds are reversible electrostatic interactions between ions...
02:49Bond Energies and Bond Lengths
03:05Acid Strength and Molecular Structure
In the absence of any leveling effect, the acid strength of binary compounds of hydrogen with nonmetals (A) increases as the H-A bond strength decreases down a group in the periodic table. For group 17, the order of increasing acidity is HF < HCl < HBr < HI. Likewise, for group 16, the order of increasing acid strength is H2O < H2S < H2Se < H2Te. Across a row in the periodic table, the acid strength of binary hydrogen compounds increases with increasing...
02:43Peptide Bonds