Multimodality approach to renal and ureteric calculi

Minimal or non-invasivemethods for treating renal or ureteric calculi have reduced the incidence of open surgery in the West to less than 1%. Before using these methods routinely in India we need to take into account the social and economic needs of our patients and the cost-effectiveness of the therapy.

Over a period of 16 months we analysed the results of 596 renal units with renal and ureteric calculi managed by (a) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, (b) percutaneous litholapaxy, (c) ureteroscopy, (d) open surgery and (e) various combinations of a, b, c and d.

Out-patient lithotripsy achieved a satisfactory outcome in pelvic (69% complete clearance, 21% minor residue), middle calyceal (84% complete clearance, 5% minor residue) and non-impacted ureteric calculi (93% complete clearance) with limited stone bulk. Percutaneous procedures had a better and quicker outcome than lithotripsy when the stone bulk was greater than 400 mm² because it required a larger number of shock waves, repeated sittings and pre-lithotripsy stenting. Primary percutaneous debulking with adjunct lithotripsy for staghom calculi had a satisfactory outcome in 80% cases, while lithotripsy monotherapy usually failed. Percutaneous extraction resulted in a 95% success rate for large impacted upper ureteric calculi. Seventy-sixper cent of ureteric calculi below the pelvic brim were retrieved using ureteroscopy alone. Open surgery either primarily or after failure of other modalities was offered to 6.4% of the patients. It was the procedure of choice for large staghorn calculi with major stone bulk spread over various calyces, for multiple large pelvicalyceal calculi, and for calculi associated with congenital anomalies.

In India lithotripsy should only be used when a quick and satisfactory outcome is expected, otherwise an appropriate minimally invasive method or surgical stone removal should be advised.