Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gain01:15

Gain

443
Gain and phase shift are properties of linear circuits that describe the effect a circuit has on a sinusoidal input voltage or current. The circuit's behavior that contains reactive elements will depend on the frequency of the input sinusoid. As a result, it is observed that the gain and phase shift will all be frequency functions.
Gain:
Suppose Vin is the input and Vout is the output signal to a circuit.
443
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.9K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.9K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

359
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
359
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Human Melanoma Single Cell Profiles to Evolutionary Medicine Model Xiphophorus Provides Insights in Disease Control.

Pigment cell & melanoma research·2026
Same author

Examining Gastrointestinal, Feeding, Sleep, and Anxiety-Related Disorders Among Autistic Pediatric Patients.

Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners·2026
Same author

Estimating PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at public schools in North Carolina using multiple data sources and interpolation methods.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Land Use and Ecosystem Service Value Spatiotemporal Dynamics, Topographic Gradient Effect and Their Driving Factors in Typical Alpine Ecosystems of the East Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Implications for Conservation and Development.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Construction of an Efficient Engineered Strain for Chaetoglobosin A Bioresource Production from Potato Starch Industrial Waste.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Spatial Regulation of Rice Leaf Morphology by miRNA-Target Complexes During Viral Infection.

Plant, cell & environment·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Laser Capture Microdissection of Glioma Subregions for Spatial and Molecular Characterization of Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Oncostreams, and Invasion
09:09

Laser Capture Microdissection of Glioma Subregions for Spatial and Molecular Characterization of Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Oncostreams, and Invasion

Published on: April 12, 2020

7.5K

Gaining relevance from the random: Interpreting observed spatial heterogeneity.

Rachel Carroll1, Shanshan Zhao1

  • 1Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA.

Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology
|May 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a quantitative method to analyze spatial random effects in Bayesian disease mapping, improving risk factor identification and interpretation for public health insights.

Keywords:
Disease mappingINLARandom effectsSpatial epidemiology

More Related Videos

Generation of Heterogeneous Drug Gradients Across Cancer Populations on a Microfluidic Evolution Accelerator for Real-Time Observation
10:24

Generation of Heterogeneous Drug Gradients Across Cancer Populations on a Microfluidic Evolution Accelerator for Real-Time Observation

Published on: September 19, 2019

6.8K
Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles
08:44

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles

Published on: January 3, 2017

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Laser Capture Microdissection of Glioma Subregions for Spatial and Molecular Characterization of Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Oncostreams, and Invasion
09:09

Laser Capture Microdissection of Glioma Subregions for Spatial and Molecular Characterization of Intratumoral Heterogeneity, Oncostreams, and Invasion

Published on: April 12, 2020

7.5K
Generation of Heterogeneous Drug Gradients Across Cancer Populations on a Microfluidic Evolution Accelerator for Real-Time Observation
10:24

Generation of Heterogeneous Drug Gradients Across Cancer Populations on a Microfluidic Evolution Accelerator for Real-Time Observation

Published on: September 19, 2019

6.8K
Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles
08:44

Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles

Published on: January 3, 2017

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Background:

  • Bayesian disease mapping commonly uses spatial random effects to control for confounding.
  • Current methods often rely on qualitative interpretations of spatial risk patterns.
  • Unmeasured risk factors can bias disease mapping estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a quantitative secondary assessment for spatial random effects in Bayesian disease mapping.
  • To demonstrate how to recover unmeasured or unincluded risk factors.
  • To enhance the interpretability and applicability of spatial random effects in disease mapping.

Main Methods:

  • A secondary model is fitted to estimate associations between spatial region-level risk factors and spatial random effects.
  • This approach quantifies the contribution of unmeasured factors.
  • Bayesian inference is employed for model fitting.

Main Results:

  • The secondary assessment successfully recovers important unmeasured risk factors.
  • Quantitative associations between risk factors and spatial random effects are identified.
  • The method provides a more objective basis for understanding spatial disease patterns.

Conclusions:

  • This quantitative technique significantly improves the utility of spatial random effects in disease mapping.
  • It allows for more interpretable conclusions regarding disease risk and contributing factors.
  • The approach highlights the practical applicability of advanced spatial statistical methods in public health.