Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

7.4K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
7.4K
Fruit Development, Structure, and Function01:58

Fruit Development, Structure, and Function

25.4K
Fruits form from a mature flower ovary. As seeds develop from the ovules contained within, the ovary wall undergoes a series of complex changes to form fruit. In some fruits, such as soybeans, the ovary wall dries; in other fruits, such as grapes, it remains fleshy. In some cases, organs other than the ovary contribute to fruit formation; such fruits are called accessory fruits.
25.4K
Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

7.0K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
7.0K
Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

30.0K
Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity.  In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to...
30.0K
Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

3.3K
3.3K
Cholinesterases: Distribution and Function01:22

Cholinesterases: Distribution and Function

1.1K
Cholinesterases are a group of serine hydrolase enzymes that play a crucial role in the breakdown of choline esters. The two primary types of cholinesterases are acetylcholinesterases (AChEs) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChEs), which differ in their distribution, function, and substrate specificity. AChEs, also known as true cholinesterases, specifically hydrolyze acetylcholine, while BuChEs, often referred to as pseudocholinesterases, can hydrolyze various choline esters, including...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constructing concepts without feedback: An empirical investigation of how relational information affects multidimensional concept completion behavior in an unsupervised task.

PloS one·2025
Same author

A comparative investigation of integral- and separable-dimension stimulus-sorting behavior.

Psychological research·2022
Same author

Classification of three-dimensional integral stimuli: Accounting for a replication and extension of Nosofsky and Palmeri (1996) with a dual discrimination invariance model.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same author

Context, structure, and informativeness judgments: An extensive empirical investigation.

Memory & cognition·2020
Same author

On the learning difficulty of visual and auditory modal concepts: Evidence for a single processing system.

Cognitive processing·2017
Same author

Constructing and Deconstructing Concepts.

Experimental psychology·2016
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Classification errors and response times over multiple distributed sessions as a function of category structure.

Derek E Zeigler1,2, Ronaldo Vigo3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology, West Virginia Wesleyan College, Buckhannon, WV, 26201, USA. zeigler.d@wvwc.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|May 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Concept learning difficulty orderings are stable across sessions when stimuli are mixed. However, repeated exposure to single category types reveals different stability patterns for errors versus response times (RTs).

Keywords:
CategorizationConcept learningExpertisePerceptual fluency

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

27.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K
Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

27.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Concept Learning
  • Categorization Research

Background:

  • Concept learning research traditionally uses classification accuracy to order learning difficulty.
  • Stability of these orderings over extended learning and the role of response times (RTs) are less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the stability of learning difficulty orderings for categorical stimuli across multiple sessions.
  • To examine the influence of classification accuracy (errors) and response times (RTs) on perceived learning difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments used a well-established family of category structures with three binary dimensions and four positive examples.
  • Participants learned categories of 'flasks' varying in size, shape, and color.
  • Experiment 1: Random presentation of all category types across three sessions.
  • Experiment 2: Repeated exposure to single category types across sessions.

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 showed stable difficulty orderings for both errors and RTs across sessions with mixed stimuli.
  • Experiment 2 revealed that error-based orderings disappeared with repeated exposure, while RT-based orderings emerged.
  • This suggests processing difficulty persists even with reduced errors.

Conclusions:

  • Learning difficulty orderings can be stable or dynamic depending on stimulus presentation and the measure used (errors vs. RTs).
  • Response times may offer a more sensitive measure of persistent learning difficulty than accuracy alone.
  • Findings inform concept learning and perceptual expertise theories.