Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

The Dig Task: A Simple Scent Discrimination Reveals Deficits Following Frontal Brain Damage
Published on: January 4, 2013
Response of the multiple-demand network during simple stimulus discriminations
Tanya Wen1, Daniel J Mitchell1, John Duncan1
1Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
The multiple-demand (MD) network shows minimal response to sensory task difficulty in motion discrimination. Increased rule complexity, however, significantly elevates MD activity, suggesting limits on top-down control for sensory input.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Human Perception
Background:
- The multiple-demand (MD) network is crucial for cognitive control, responding to various task difficulty aspects like rule complexity and memory load.
- Existing research suggests MD activity is linked to top-down control, but its role when sensory input quality limits performance is less understood.
- Prior studies indicated minimal impact of sensory manipulations on MD activity, questioning the extent of top-down compensation for sensory limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between sensory task difficulty and multiple-demand (MD) network activity.
- To examine how manipulating motion coherence and distractor salience affects MD responses.
- To compare the impact of sensory difficulty versus rule complexity on MD network engagement.
Main Methods:
- Participants judged motion direction with difficulty manipulated across six levels via motion coherence or irrelevant dot salience.
- Task difficulty was presented in either blocked (predictable) or randomized (unpredictable) conditions.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measured brain activity, focusing on the MD network.
Main Results:
- MD network activity showed minimal changes with increasing sensory difficulty, particularly for the motion coherence manipulation.
- Randomized difficulty levels did not significantly alter the small effects of sensory manipulations on MD activity.
- In contrast, increased rule complexity consistently elevated MD activity, as expected.
Conclusions:
- For simple sensory discriminations, the multiple-demand network may not effectively compensate for reduced stimulus information through increased top-down control.
- These findings highlight a potential limit in the capacity of top-down control to overcome sensory input quality degradation.
- The dissociation between sensory difficulty and rule complexity effects suggests distinct mechanisms underlying MD network engagement.
More Related Videos
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012
10:05Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
Published on: January 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Responses to Drought and Flooding