Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Detection of the pH-dependent Activity of Escherichia coli Chaperone HdeB In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: October 23, 2016
Microglial Activation After Systemic Stimulation With Lipopolysaccharide and Escherichia coli
Inge C M Hoogland1, Dunja Westhoff1, Joo-Yeon Engelen-Lee1
1Department of Neurology, Center of Infection and Immunity Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Live Escherichia coli (E. coli) infection causes a delayed, less intense neuroinflammatory response compared to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation in mice. This E. coli model better reflects delirium associated with clinical infections.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Microbiology
Background:
- Microglial activation is implicated in sepsis-associated delirium.
- Distinct microglial responses to live bacteria versus lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been suggested.
- This study models microglial activation following live Escherichia coli (E. coli) infection and compares it to LPS challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare microglial activation patterns in response to live E. coli infection versus LPS administration in a mouse model.
- To determine the temporal dynamics and intensity of neuroinflammation induced by E. coli compared to LPS.
- To establish which model more closely mimics clinical infection-associated delirium.
Main Methods:
- Mice were challenged with live E. coli or LPS, with control groups receiving saline.
- Microglial activation was assessed using immunohistochemistry (Iba-1) and flow cytometry (cell size, CD45, CD11b).
- Cerebral inflammatory mediator mRNA expression (TNF-α, IL-1β, MCP-1) was quantified.
Main Results:
- E. coli infection induced microglial activation at 72 hours post-inoculation, characterized by increased cell number and size, and CD45 expression, but not CD11b.
- LPS stimulation resulted in earlier (48 hours) and more robust microglial activation, with increased cell number, size, CD45, and CD11b expression.
- While E. coli caused a delayed and less pronounced inflammatory response, LPS significantly upregulated TNF-α, IL-1β, and MCP-1 mRNA levels.
Conclusions:
- Systemic E. coli infection elicits a delayed and less vigorous neuroinflammatory response compared to LPS.
- The E. coli model provides a more clinically relevant representation of infection-associated delirium than LPS stimulation.
- Differences in microglial activation highlight the complexity of neuroinflammation in response to varying infectious agents.
Related Concept Videos
Formation of Lipopolysaccharides
Second Order systems II
Chemotaxis in E. coli
First Order Systems
When a first-order system is subjected to a unit-step input, its response is characterized by its transfer function. By applying the Laplace transform of the unit-step input to the transfer function, expanding the...
Second Order systems I
By reinterpreting the system, one can derive the closed-loop transfer function, which...
Stringent Response in E. coli

