Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems01:22

Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems

214
Body:Bioavailability is a critical pharmacological concept that measures the extent and rate at which an active drug ingredient or therapeutic moiety enters the systemic circulation, remaining unchanged. It's a pivotal factor in determining a drug's efficacy and safety.The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) plays an essential role in drug development by categorizing drugs into four classes based on their solubility and permeability. This classification aids in understanding drug...
214
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps01:16

Characteristics of Practical Op Amps

872
A difference amplifier, a crucial component in numerous electronic devices, ideally amplifies only the difference-mode signal, which is the difference between two input signals. However, in practical circuits, the output voltage depends on both the differential gain and the common-mode gain.
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
872
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice01:30

Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice

17.7K
Theories play an essential role in organizing patient care. Theories refer to a proposed or followed belief, policy, or procedure that is the basis for action. Nursing theories are knowledge-based concepts that guide nurses' actions, influence nursing education and practice, and allow nurses to care for their patients.
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
17.7K
Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers01:28

Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers

1.4K
The practical equivalent circuits of single-phase two-winding transformers exhibit significant deviations from their idealized versions due to the inherent properties of winding resistance and finite core permeability. These properties result in real and reactive power losses, affecting the transformer's performance. Understanding these deviations is crucial for designing more efficient transformers.
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The...
1.4K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retraction notice to "Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) delivery approaches in regenerative medicine" [Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 166 (2023) 115301].

Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie·2026
Same author

Characterization of exosomes from hypoxia-activated human amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells.

Iranian journal of basic medical sciences·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Fabrication of functional and nano-biocomposite scaffolds using strontium-doped bredigite nanoparticles/polycaprolactone/poly lactic acid via 3D printing for bone regeneration" [Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Volume 219 (2022), Pages 1319-1336].

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Advances and limitations in angiogenesis assays: Integrating in vitro, in vivo, and emerging technologies.

Vascular pharmacology·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Review on biofilms and the currently available antibiofilm approaches: Matrix-destabilizing hydrolases and anti-bacterial peptides as promising candidates for the food industries' [Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Volume 219, 31 October 2022, pages 1163-1179].

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Bioglass nanofibers in a 3D scaffold orchestrate robust bone regeneration via enhanced osteogenesis and mineralization.

Cell and tissue banking·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
09:46

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials

Published on: July 8, 2021

4.6K

Biomaterials Evaluation: Conceptual Refinements and Practical Reforms.

Reza Masaeli1, Kavosh Zandsalimi2, Lobat Tayebi3,4

  • 11 Dental Biomaterials Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
|May 15, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating biomaterials is crucial for public health. Current regulations face challenges, necessitating improvements for more effective assessment of medical biomaterials in the US and EU.

Keywords:
biomaterials evaluationperformancepostmarket surveillancepremarket evaluationsafety

More Related Videos

A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo
07:56

A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo

Published on: August 28, 2014

12.9K
Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
10:19

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models

Published on: August 9, 2012

19.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
09:46

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials

Published on: July 8, 2021

4.6K
A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo
07:56

A Full Skin Defect Model to Evaluate Vascularization of Biomaterials In Vivo

Published on: August 28, 2014

12.9K
Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
10:19

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models

Published on: August 9, 2012

19.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Medical Device Regulation
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Biomaterials are increasingly used in medicine, making their accurate assessment vital for safety and efficacy.
  • Despite rigorous premarket evaluations, regulatory agencies receive numerous adverse event reports annually.
  • Current biomaterial evaluation faces challenges including regulatory differences, timing issues, and data biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of robust biomaterial evaluation processes.
  • To identify key challenges in current biomaterial assessment strategies.
  • To propose conceptual and practical reforms for improving biomaterial regulation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on biomaterial evaluation and regulation.
  • Analysis of challenges in current regulatory frameworks.
  • Comparative assessment of regulatory strategies in the US and EU.

Main Results:

  • Identified dissimilar regulations, developmental asynchrony, data biases, and cost/timing as major hurdles.
  • Evidence suggests current medical device regulations require enhancement for effective biomaterial evaluation.
  • Proposed specific refinements and reforms to existing regulatory processes.

Conclusions:

  • Improving biomaterial evaluation is essential for ensuring public health and device safety.
  • Regulatory frameworks in the US and EU need strategic updates to address current challenges.
  • Enhanced regulations will lead to more efficient and effective biomaterial assessment.