Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
Published on: January 19, 2020
From sticky-hard-sphere to Lennard-Jones-type clusters
Lukas Trombach1, Robert S Hoy2, David J Wales3
1Centre for Theoretical Chemistry and Physics, New Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Massey University Auckland, Private Bag 102904, 0632 Auckland, New Zealand.
The study establishes a relationship between sticky-hard-sphere clusters and Lennard-Jones potential minima. Cluster stability and structure depend non-trivially on potential parameters, with numbers increasing exponentially with size.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Statistical mechanics
- Materials science
Background:
- Understanding the relationship between simplified physical models and complex potential energy landscapes is crucial for predicting material properties.
- The Lennard-Jones potential is a widely used model for interatomic interactions, but its application to clusters can be complex.
- Sticky-hard-sphere models offer a simplified approach to cluster formation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a mapping between nonisomorphic sticky-hard-sphere (SHS) clusters and local energy minima of the (m,n)-Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential.
- To investigate how the number and nature of stable clusters depend on the parameters (m,n) of the LJ potential.
- To assess the completeness of the LJ potential landscape in representing SHS cluster structures.
Main Methods:
- Establishing a mathematical relation (map) M_{SHS→LJ} between sets of clusters.
- Analyzing the injectivity and surjectivity of this map.
- Investigating cluster stability and energy minima for varying (m,n) parameters.
- Comparing results from standard LJ potentials with an extended LJ potential derived from coupled-cluster calculations.
Main Results:
- The number of nonisomorphic stable clusters depends strongly and non-trivially on m and n.
- Cluster numbers increase exponentially with size (N≳10).
- The map M_{SHS→LJ} is noninjective and nonsurjective, but few LJ structures are missing for N≤13, often corresponding to unfavorable minima.
- Even soft LJ potentials highlight coordination challenges (Gregory-Newton problem for N=13).
- An extended LJ potential significantly increases the number of nonisomorphic clusters compared to the standard (6,12)-LJ potential.
Conclusions:
- The (m,n)-Lennard-Jones potential landscape captures many, but not all, sticky-hard-sphere cluster structures.
- Cluster structure and stability are sensitive to the specific LJ potential parameters.
- More realistic potentials, like the extended LJ potential, reveal a richer and more complex energy landscape for atomic clusters.
Related Concept Videos
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Vesicular Tubular Clusters
With the help of motor proteins such...
Electric Field of a Non Uniformly Charged Sphere
Consider a non-uniformly charged sphere, for which the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. Such a sphere has a spherically symmetrical charge distribution. Here, the electric...
Types of RNA
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs perform diverse functions and can be broadly classified as protein-coding or non-coding RNA. Non-coding RNAs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in response to developmental and environmental changes. Non-coding RNAs in prokaryotes can be manipulated to develop more effective antibacterial drugs for human or animal use.
RNA...
Types of Hormones

