STRONGkids: Predictive Validation in Brazilian Children

Mara Alves da Cruz Gouveia1, Rafael Miranda Tassitano2, Gisélia Alves Pontes da Silva1

  • 1Mother and Child Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Insights

The STRONGkids tool has limited accuracy in predicting weight loss in hospitalized children, showing low sensitivity. Clinical data should supplement this preliminary evaluation tool for better patient assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Clinical Assessment Tools

Background:

  • Nutritional status is critical for pediatric patient outcomes.
  • Accurate prediction of weight loss and hospital stay duration is essential for effective pediatric care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the STRONGkids tool's efficacy in predicting weight loss and hospital stay in children.
  • To determine the association between anthropometric nutritional status at admission and weight loss/hospital stay.

Main Methods:

  • A methodological study involving 245 children aged 1-10 years admitted to a tertiary hospital.
  • Daily weighing of participants until discharge to track weight changes.
  • Validation of the STRONGkids tool using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, alongside anthropometric assessments.

Main Results:

  • Over half of the children (52.7%) experienced weight loss during hospitalization.
  • The STRONGkids tool demonstrated 55.8% sensitivity and 38.8% specificity for identifying weight loss.
  • Anthropometric assessment showed 26.5% sensitivity and 75.9% specificity for weight loss prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The STRONGkids tool, primarily based on clinical evaluation, exhibits low sensitivity and a high false-positive rate for predicting weight loss.
  • It is recommended as a preliminary tool, necessitating supplementation with clinical data for comprehensive patient evaluation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.1K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.1K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.4K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
2.1K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.9K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.4K